↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SWV106+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:44:15 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.60s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SWV106+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May  9 05:15:53 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.60/0.78  % Version:  1.5
% 0.60/0.78  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.60/0.78  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.60/0.78  fof(quaternion_ds1_inuse_0018,conjecture,((((((((![A]:((leq(n0,A)&leq(A,minus(m_measvars,n1)))=>a_select2(rho_defuse,A)=use))&(![B]:((leq(n0,B)&leq(B,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(sigma_defuse,B)=use)))&(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,minus(n_steps,n1)))=>a_select3(u_defuse,C,D)=use))))&(![E]:((leq(n0,E)&leq(E,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(xinit_defuse,E)=use)))&(![F]:((leq(n0,F)&leq(F,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,F)=use)))&(![G]:((leq(n0,G)&leq(G,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,G)=use)))&(![H]:(![I]:((((leq(n0,H)&leq(n0,I))&leq(H,minus(m_measvars,n1)))&leq(I,minus(n_steps,n1)))=>a_select3(z_defuse,H,I)=use))))=>true),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', quaternion_ds1_inuse_0018)).
% 0.60/0.78  fof(c66,negated_conjecture,(~((((((((![A]:((leq(n0,A)&leq(A,minus(m_measvars,n1)))=>a_select2(rho_defuse,A)=use))&(![B]:((leq(n0,B)&leq(B,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(sigma_defuse,B)=use)))&(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,minus(n_steps,n1)))=>a_select3(u_defuse,C,D)=use))))&(![E]:((leq(n0,E)&leq(E,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(xinit_defuse,E)=use)))&(![F]:((leq(n0,F)&leq(F,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,F)=use)))&(![G]:((leq(n0,G)&leq(G,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,G)=use)))&(![H]:(![I]:((((leq(n0,H)&leq(n0,I))&leq(H,minus(m_measvars,n1)))&leq(I,minus(n_steps,n1)))=>a_select3(z_defuse,H,I)=use))))=>true)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[quaternion_ds1_inuse_0018])).
% 0.60/0.78  fof(c67,negated_conjecture,((((((((![A]:((~leq(n0,A)|~leq(A,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|a_select2(rho_defuse,A)=use))&(![B]:((~leq(n0,B)|~leq(B,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(sigma_defuse,B)=use)))&(![C]:(![D]:((((~leq(n0,C)|~leq(n0,D))|~leq(C,n2))|~leq(D,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(u_defuse,C,D)=use))))&(![E]:((~leq(n0,E)|~leq(E,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_defuse,E)=use)))&(![F]:((~leq(n0,F)|~leq(F,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,F)=use)))&(![G]:((~leq(n0,G)|~leq(G,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,G)=use)))&(![H]:(![I]:((((~leq(n0,H)|~leq(n0,I))|~leq(H,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|~leq(I,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(z_defuse,H,I)=use))))&~true),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c66])).
% 0.60/0.78  fof(c69,negated_conjecture,(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:(![X11]:(![X12]:(![X13]:(![X14]:(![X15]:(![X16]:(((((((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(X8,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|a_select2(rho_defuse,X8)=use)&((~leq(n0,X9)|~leq(X9,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(sigma_defuse,X9)=use))&((((~leq(n0,X10)|~leq(n0,X11))|~leq(X10,n2))|~leq(X11,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(u_defuse,X10,X11)=use))&((~leq(n0,X12)|~leq(X12,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_defuse,X12)=use))&((~leq(n0,X13)|~leq(X13,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X13)=use))&((~leq(n0,X14)|~leq(X14,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,X14)=use))&((((~leq(n0,X15)|~leq(n0,X16))|~leq(X15,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|~leq(X16,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(z_defuse,X15,X16)=use))&~true)))))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c68,negated_conjecture,((((((((![X8]:((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(X8,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|a_select2(rho_defuse,X8)=use))&(![X9]:((~leq(n0,X9)|~leq(X9,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(sigma_defuse,X9)=use)))&(![X10]:(![X11]:((((~leq(n0,X10)|~leq(n0,X11))|~leq(X10,n2))|~leq(X11,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(u_defuse,X10,X11)=use))))&(![X12]:((~leq(n0,X12)|~leq(X12,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_defuse,X12)=use)))&(![X13]:((~leq(n0,X13)|~leq(X13,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X13)=use)))&(![X14]:((~leq(n0,X14)|~leq(X14,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,X14)=use)))&(![X15]:(![X16]:((((~leq(n0,X15)|~leq(n0,X16))|~leq(X15,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|~leq(X16,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(z_defuse,X15,X16)=use))))&~true),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c67])).])).
% 0.60/0.78  cnf(c77,negated_conjecture,~true,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c69])).
% 0.60/0.78  fof(ttrue,axiom,true,file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax', ttrue)).
% 0.60/0.78  cnf(c79,plain,true,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue])).
% 0.60/0.78  cnf(c464,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c79, c77])).
% 0.60/0.78  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.60/0.78  
% 0.60/0.78  % Initial clauses    : 320
% 0.60/0.78  % Processed clauses  : 2
% 0.60/0.78  % Factors computed   : 0
% 0.60/0.78  % Resolvents computed: 1
% 0.60/0.78  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.60/0.78  % Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.60/0.78  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.60/0.78  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.60/0.78  % User time          : 0.408 s
% 0.60/0.78  % System time        : 0.013 s
% 0.60/0.78  % Total time         : 0.421 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------