↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWV119+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:15:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   3   ~;   0   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(quaternion_ds1_symm_0012,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(n0,pv49)
      & leq(pv49,minus(n6,n1)) )
   => ( lt(n0,a_select2(sigma,pv49))
     => true ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',quaternion_ds1_symm_0012) ).

fof(ttrue,axiom,
    true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',ttrue) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(n0,pv49)
        & leq(pv49,minus(n6,n1)) )
     => ( lt(n0,a_select2(sigma,pv49))
       => true ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[quaternion_ds1_symm_0012]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(n0,pv49)
    & leq(pv49,minus(n6,n1))
    & lt(n0,a_select2(sigma,pv49))
    & ~ true ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    true,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ true,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV119+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 01:11:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 7
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 0.22/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 94
% 0.22/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 22
% 0.22/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 79
% 0.22/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 77
% 0.22/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1
% 0.22/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1
% 0.22/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.22/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 75
% 0.22/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 130
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3605
% 0.22/1.41  
% 0.22/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.22/1.41  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.41  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.22/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 2924 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------