↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SWV121+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:04:36 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.54s 3.70s
% Output   : Proof 3.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV121+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 12:22:23 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.54/3.70  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.54/3.70  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.54/3.70  Clause #50 (by assumption #[]): Eq true True
% 3.54/3.70  Clause #52 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.54/3.70    (Not
% 3.54/3.70      (And
% 3.54/3.70          (And
% 3.54/3.70            (∀ (A B : Iota),
% 3.54/3.70              And (And (And (leq n0 A) (leq n0 B)) (leq A (minus n6 n1))) (leq B (minus n6 n1)) →
% 3.54/3.70                Eq (a_select3 q_ds1_filter A B) (a_select3 q_ds1_filter B A))
% 3.54/3.70            (∀ (C D : Iota),
% 3.54/3.70              And (And (And (leq n0 C) (leq n0 D)) (leq C (minus n3 n1))) (leq D (minus n3 n1)) →
% 3.54/3.70                Eq (a_select3 r_ds1_filter C D) (a_select3 r_ds1_filter D C)))
% 3.54/3.70          (∀ (E F : Iota),
% 3.54/3.70            And (And (And (leq n0 E) (leq n0 F)) (leq E (minus n6 n1))) (leq F (minus n6 n1)) →
% 3.54/3.70              Eq (a_select3 pminus_ds1_filter E F) (a_select3 pminus_ds1_filter F E)) →
% 3.54/3.70        true))
% 3.54/3.70    True
% 3.54/3.70  Clause #94 (by clausification #[52]): Eq
% 3.54/3.70    (And
% 3.54/3.70        (And
% 3.54/3.70          (∀ (A B : Iota),
% 3.54/3.70            And (And (And (leq n0 A) (leq n0 B)) (leq A (minus n6 n1))) (leq B (minus n6 n1)) →
% 3.54/3.70              Eq (a_select3 q_ds1_filter A B) (a_select3 q_ds1_filter B A))
% 3.54/3.70          (∀ (C D : Iota),
% 3.54/3.70            And (And (And (leq n0 C) (leq n0 D)) (leq C (minus n3 n1))) (leq D (minus n3 n1)) →
% 3.54/3.70              Eq (a_select3 r_ds1_filter C D) (a_select3 r_ds1_filter D C)))
% 3.54/3.70        (∀ (E F : Iota),
% 3.54/3.70          And (And (And (leq n0 E) (leq n0 F)) (leq E (minus n6 n1))) (leq F (minus n6 n1)) →
% 3.54/3.70            Eq (a_select3 pminus_ds1_filter E F) (a_select3 pminus_ds1_filter F E)) →
% 3.54/3.70      true)
% 3.54/3.70    False
% 3.54/3.70  Clause #96 (by clausification #[94]): Eq true False
% 3.54/3.70  Clause #106 (by superposition #[96, 50]): Eq False True
% 3.54/3.70  Clause #127 (by clausification #[106]): False
% 3.54/3.70  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------