↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SWV128+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:20:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.35s 1.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   24 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (   3   ~;   0   |;  35   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  14 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thruster_inuse_0001,conjecture,
    ( ( t_defuse = use
      & tvar_defuse = use
      & ! [X14,X18] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X14)
            & leq(n0,X18)
            & leq(X14,minus(m_measvars,n1))
            & leq(X18,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
         => a_select3(rho_defuse,X14,X18) = use )
      & ! [X4,X20] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X4)
            & leq(n0,X20)
            & leq(X4,n7)
            & leq(X20,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
         => a_select3(tr_defuse,X4,X20) = use )
      & ! [X21] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X21)
            & leq(X21,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(xinit_defuse,X21) = use )
      & ! [X22] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X22)
            & leq(X22,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X22) = use )
      & ! [X28,X29] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X28)
            & leq(n0,X29)
            & leq(X28,minus(m_measvars,n1))
            & leq(X29,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
         => a_select3(z_defuse,X28,X29) = use ) )
   => true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thruster_inuse_0001) ).

fof(ttrue,axiom,
    true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',ttrue) ).

fof(c_0_2,plain,
    ( epred2_0
  <=> ( t_defuse = use
      & tvar_defuse = use
      & ! [X14,X18] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X14)
            & leq(n0,X18)
            & leq(X14,minus(m_measvars,n1))
            & leq(X18,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
         => a_select3(rho_defuse,X14,X18) = use )
      & ! [X4,X20] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X4)
            & leq(n0,X20)
            & leq(X4,n7)
            & leq(X20,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
         => a_select3(tr_defuse,X4,X20) = use )
      & ! [X21] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X21)
            & leq(X21,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(xinit_defuse,X21) = use )
      & ! [X22] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X22)
            & leq(X22,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X22) = use )
      & ! [X28,X29] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X28)
            & leq(n0,X29)
            & leq(X28,minus(m_measvars,n1))
            & leq(X29,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
         => a_select3(z_defuse,X28,X29) = use ) ) ),
    introduced(definition) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( epred2_0
     => true ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thruster_inuse_0001]),c_0_2]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred2_0
    & ~ true ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ true,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    true,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWV128+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 04:55:54 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.35/1.63  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.35/1.63  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/1.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/1.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.35/1.63  % Total time : 1.274s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------