↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV134+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:06:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 14.77s 2.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (   8   ~;   4   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(transitivity_leq,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( leq(Y,Z)
        & leq(X,Y) )
     => leq(X,Z) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transitivity_leq) ).

fof(leq_gt1,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( gt(Y,X)
     => leq(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_gt1) ).

fof(gauss_array_0004,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7))
      & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
      & leq(pv1325,n3)
      & leq(s_worst7,n3)
      & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
      & leq(s_best7,n3)
      & leq(n2,pv1325)
      & leq(n0,s_worst7)
      & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
      & leq(n0,s_best7)
      & ~ leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7)) )
   => leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',gauss_array_0004) ).

fof(gauss_array_0004_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7))
        & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
        & leq(pv1325,n3)
        & leq(s_worst7,n3)
        & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
        & leq(s_best7,n3)
        & leq(n2,pv1325)
        & leq(n0,s_worst7)
        & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
        & leq(n0,s_best7)
        & ~ leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7)) )
     => leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[gauss_array_0004]) ).

cnf(c_65,plain,
    ( leq(A,C)
    | ~ leq(B,C)
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[transitivity_leq]) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    ( leq(B,A)
    | ~ gt(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_gt1]) ).

fof(gt_2_0,axiom,
    gt(n2,n0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',gt_2_0) ).

cnf(c_334,plain,
    gt(n2,n0),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[gt_2_0]) ).

cnf(c_360,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[gauss_array_0004_neg]) ).

cnf(c_367,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[gauss_array_0004_neg]) ).

cnf(c_1634,plain,
    leq(n0,n2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_334,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_3104,plain,
    ( leq(A,pv1325)
    | ~ leq(A,n2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_360,c_65]) ).

cnf(c_14134,plain,
    leq(n0,pv1325),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_3104,c_1634]) ).

cnf(c_14133,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_367,c_14134]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV134+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.56  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.56  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.56  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.56  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.56  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.56  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.56  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.56  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:17:57 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.56  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.56  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.56  % Process 1075106 was started by sandbox on n026,
% 0.10/0.56  % Sat Sep 26 13:17:57 2026
% 0.10/0.56  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.62  
% 0.10/0.62  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 14.77/2.57  
% 14.77/2.57  % given #500 (I,wt=143): 572 leq(n0,f19(A,B,C,D,E,F,n0,V6)) | leq(n0,f22(A,B,C,D,E,F,n0,V6)) | leq(f23(A,B,C,D,E,F,n0,V6),n0) | -leq(n0,V7) | -leq(V7,n0) | a_select3(tptp_madd(A,tptp_mmul(B,tptp_mmul(tptp_madd(tptp_mmul(C,tptp_mmul(D,trans(C))),tptp_mmul(E,tptp_mmul(F,trans(E)))),trans(B)))),n0,V7) = a_select3(tptp_madd(A,tptp_mmul(B,tptp_mmul(tptp_madd(tptp_mmul(C,tptp_mmul(D,trans(C))),tptp_mmul(E,tptp_mmul(F,trans(E)))),trans(B)))),V7,n0).  [factor(164,d,e),flip(g),unit_del(d,64)].
% 14.77/2.57  
% 14.77/2.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 14.77/2.57  
% 14.77/2.57  % Proof 1 at 1.57 (+ 0.32) seconds.
% 14.77/2.57  % Length of proof is 11.
% 14.77/2.57  % Level of proof is 3.
% 14.77/2.57  % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 14.77/2.57  % Given clauses 923.
% 14.77/2.57  
% 14.77/2.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------