↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV134+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.69s 1.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   86 (  24   ~;  15   |;  43   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  24   !;   0   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( leq(X1,X2)
        & leq(X0,X1) )
     => leq(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',transitivity_leq) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( gt(X1,X0)
     => leq(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt1) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7))
      & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
      & leq(pv1325,n3)
      & leq(s_worst7,n3)
      & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
      & leq(s_best7,n3)
      & leq(n2,pv1325)
      & leq(n0,s_worst7)
      & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
      & leq(n0,s_best7)
      & ~ leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7)) )
   => leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',gauss_array_0004) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7))
        & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
        & leq(pv1325,n3)
        & leq(s_worst7,n3)
        & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
        & leq(s_best7,n3)
        & leq(n2,pv1325)
        & leq(n0,s_worst7)
        & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
        & leq(n0,s_best7)
        & ~ leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7)) )
     => leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).

fof(f65,axiom,
    gt(n2,n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',gt_2_0) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ gt(X1,X0)
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7))
    & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
    & leq(pv1325,n3)
    & leq(s_worst7,n3)
    & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
    & leq(s_best7,n3)
    & leq(n2,pv1325)
    & leq(n0,s_worst7)
    & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
    & leq(n0,s_best7)
    & ~ leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
    & ~ leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_sworst7))
    & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
    & leq(pv1325,n3)
    & leq(s_worst7,n3)
    & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
    & leq(s_best7,n3)
    & leq(n2,pv1325)
    & leq(n0,s_worst7)
    & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
    & leq(n0,s_best7)
    & ~ leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
    & ~ leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f136]) ).

fof(f194,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f99]) ).

fof(f195,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ gt(X1,X0)
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f306,plain,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

fof(f311,plain,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

fof(f322,plain,
    gt(n2,n0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,X2)
      | ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f194]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X1,X0)
      | ~ gt(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f195]) ).

tcf(c_157,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f311]) ).

tcf(c_162,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f306]) ).

tcf(c_179,plain,
    gt(n2,n0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f322]) ).

tcf(c_8755,plain,
    leq(n0,n2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_179,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_9844,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( leq(n0,pv1325)
      | ~ leq(n0,X0)
      | ~ leq(X0,pv1325) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

tcf(c_10597,plain,
    ( leq(n0,pv1325)
    | ~ leq(n2,pv1325)
    | ~ leq(n0,n2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_9844]) ).

tcf(c_10598,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_10597,c_8755,c_157,c_162]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SWV134+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.05/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.05/0.30  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:35:09 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.05/0.30  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.05/0.33  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.05/0.33  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.08/0.34  % Proving...
% 3.69/1.10  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/1.10  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.69/1.10  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.69/1.10  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 15  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ Proving...
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % 
% 3.69/1.10  % clauses                               156
% 3.69/1.10  % conjectures                           12
% 3.69/1.10  % EPR                                   48
% 3.69/1.10  % Horn                                  106
% 3.69/1.10  % unary                                 62
% 3.69/1.10  % binary                                34
% 3.69/1.10  % lits                                  495
% 3.69/1.10  % lits eq                               117
% 3.69/1.10  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.69/1.10  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.69/1.10  % fd_cond                               6
% 3.69/1.10  % fd_pseudo_cond                        4
% 3.69/1.10  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ 
% 3.69/1.10  % Current options:
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ 
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % 
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % ------ Proving...
% 3.69/1.10  % 
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.69/1.10  
% 3.69/1.10  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------