↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV136+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:06:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 14.43s 2.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  22 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  10   ~;   8   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn   9   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(transitivity_gt,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( gt(Y,Z)
        & gt(X,Y) )
     => gt(X,Z) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transitivity_gt) ).

fof(leq_gt1,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( gt(Y,X)
     => leq(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_gt1) ).

fof(succ_plus_1_r,axiom,
    ! [X] : plus(X,n1) = succ(X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',succ_plus_1_r) ).

fof(succ_plus_1_l,axiom,
    ! [X] : plus(n1,X) = succ(X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',succ_plus_1_l) ).

fof(leq_succ_gt,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( leq(succ(X),Y)
     => gt(Y,X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_succ_gt) ).

fof(gauss_array_0006,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
      & leq(pv1325,n3)
      & leq(s_worst7,n3)
      & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
      & leq(s_best7,n3)
      & leq(n2,pv1325)
      & leq(n0,s_worst7)
      & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
      & leq(n0,s_best7) )
   => leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',gauss_array_0006) ).

fof(gauss_array_0006_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
        & leq(pv1325,n3)
        & leq(s_worst7,n3)
        & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
        & leq(s_best7,n3)
        & leq(n2,pv1325)
        & leq(n0,s_worst7)
        & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
        & leq(n0,s_best7) )
     => leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[gauss_array_0006]) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    ( gt(A,C)
    | ~ gt(B,C)
    | ~ gt(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[transitivity_gt]) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    ( leq(B,A)
    | ~ gt(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_gt1]) ).

cnf(c_282,plain,
    plus(A,n1) = succ(A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[succ_plus_1_r]) ).

cnf(c_283,plain,
    succ(A) = plus(A,n1),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_282]) ).

cnf(c_284,plain,
    plus(n1,A) = succ(A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[succ_plus_1_l]) ).

cnf(c_285,plain,
    plus(n1,A) = plus(A,n1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_284]) ).

cnf(c_312,plain,
    ( gt(B,A)
    | ~ leq(succ(A),B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_succ_gt]) ).

cnf(c_313,plain,
    ( gt(B,A)
    | ~ leq(plus(A,n1),B) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_312]) ).

fof(gt_1_0,axiom,
    gt(n1,n0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',gt_1_0) ).

cnf(c_339,plain,
    gt(n1,n0),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[gt_1_0]) ).

fof(successor_1,axiom,
    succ(n0) = n1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',successor_1) ).

cnf(c_361,plain,
    succ(n0) = n1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[successor_1]) ).

cnf(c_362,plain,
    plus(n0,n1) = n1,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_361]) ).

fof(successor_2,axiom,
    succ(succ(n0)) = n2,
    file('theBenchmark.p',successor_2) ).

cnf(c_363,plain,
    succ(succ(n0)) = n2,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[successor_2]) ).

cnf(c_12619,plain,
    succ(plus(n0,n1)) = n2,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_363]) ).

cnf(c_12620,plain,
    succ(n1) = n2,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_362,c_12619]) ).

cnf(c_364,plain,
    plus(n1,n1) = n2,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_12620]) ).

cnf(c_370,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[gauss_array_0006_neg]) ).

cnf(c_376,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[gauss_array_0006_neg]) ).

cnf(c_12621,plain,
    ( gt(A,n1)
    | ~ leq(plus(n1,n1),A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_313]) ).

cnf(c_1192,plain,
    ( gt(A,n1)
    | ~ leq(n2,A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_364,c_12621]) ).

cnf(c_1289,plain,
    ( gt(A,n0)
    | ~ gt(A,n1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_339,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_11921,plain,
    gt(pv1325,n1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1192,c_370]) ).

cnf(c_12613,plain,
    gt(pv1325,n0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1289,c_11921]) ).

cnf(c_12622,plain,
    leq(n0,pv1325),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12613,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_12618,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_376,c_12622]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV136+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:15:50 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.38  % Process 1664097 was started by sandbox on n020,
% 0.09/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 13:15:50 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.43  
% 0.09/0.43  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 14.43/2.52  
% 14.43/2.52  % given #500 (I,wt=158): 590 leq(n0,f19(A,B,C,D,E,F,V6,V7)) | leq(f22(A,B,C,D,E,F,V6,V7),V6) | leq(n0,f23(A,B,C,D,E,F,V6,V7)) | -leq(n0,V6) | a_select3(tptp_madd(A,tptp_mmul(B,tptp_mmul(tptp_madd(tptp_mmul(C,tptp_mmul(D,trans(C))),tptp_mmul(E,tptp_mmul(F,trans(E)))),trans(B)))),n0,V6) = a_select3(tptp_madd(A,tptp_mmul(B,tptp_mmul(tptp_madd(tptp_mmul(C,tptp_mmul(D,trans(C))),tptp_mmul(E,tptp_mmul(F,trans(E)))),trans(B)))),V6,n0).  [factor(168,d,g),unit_del(e,64),unit_del(f,64)].
% 14.43/2.52  
% 14.43/2.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 14.43/2.52  
% 14.43/2.52  % Proof 1 at 1.70 (+ 0.35) seconds.
% 14.43/2.52  % Length of proof is 26.
% 14.43/2.52  % Level of proof is 8.
% 14.43/2.52  % Maximum clause weight is 18.000.
% 14.43/2.52  % Given clauses 883.
% 14.43/2.52  
% 14.43/2.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------