↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV137+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.24s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (  20   ~;  15   |;  39   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  24   !;   0   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( leq(X1,X2)
        & leq(X0,X1) )
     => leq(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',transitivity_leq) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( gt(X1,X0)
     => leq(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt1) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
      & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
      & leq(pv1325,n3)
      & leq(s_worst7,n3)
      & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
      & leq(s_best7,n3)
      & leq(n2,pv1325)
      & leq(n0,s_worst7)
      & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
      & leq(n0,s_best7) )
   => leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',gauss_array_0007) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
        & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
        & leq(pv1325,n3)
        & leq(s_worst7,n3)
        & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
        & leq(s_best7,n3)
        & leq(n2,pv1325)
        & leq(n0,s_worst7)
        & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
        & leq(n0,s_best7) )
     => leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).

fof(f65,axiom,
    gt(n2,n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',gt_2_0) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
    & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
    & leq(pv1325,n3)
    & leq(s_worst7,n3)
    & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
    & leq(s_best7,n3)
    & leq(n2,pv1325)
    & leq(n0,s_worst7)
    & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
    & leq(n0,s_best7)
    & ~ leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ( leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_worst7))
    & leq(a_select2(s_values7,pv1325),a_select2(s_values7,s_best7))
    & leq(pv1325,n3)
    & leq(s_worst7,n3)
    & leq(s_sworst7,n3)
    & leq(s_best7,n3)
    & leq(n2,pv1325)
    & leq(n0,s_worst7)
    & leq(n0,s_sworst7)
    & leq(n0,s_best7)
    & ~ leq(n0,pv1325) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f87]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ gt(X1,X0)
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ gt(X1,X0)
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    gt(n2,n0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,pv1325),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n2,pv1325),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X1,X0)
      | ~ gt(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f131]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,X2)
      | ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

tcf(c_80,plain,
    gt(n2,n0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f143]) ).

tcf(c_1411,plain,
    leq(n0,n2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_68]) ).

tcf(c_1605,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( leq(n0,pv1325)
      | ~ leq(n0,X0)
      | ~ leq(X0,pv1325) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_69]) ).

tcf(c_2040,plain,
    ( leq(n0,pv1325)
    | ~ leq(n2,pv1325)
    | ~ leq(n0,n2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1605]) ).

tcf(c_2041,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_2040,c_1411,c_49,c_53]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV137+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:38:19 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/0.42  % Proving...
% 4.24/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.24/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.24/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 10  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % 
% 4.24/1.29  % clauses                               67
% 4.24/1.29  % conjectures                           11
% 4.24/1.29  % EPR                                   43
% 4.24/1.29  % Horn                                  60
% 4.24/1.29  % unary                                 50
% 4.24/1.29  % binary                                7
% 4.24/1.29  % lits                                  109
% 4.24/1.29  % lits eq                               38
% 4.24/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.24/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.24/1.29  % fd_cond                               6
% 4.24/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        2
% 4.24/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ 
% 4.24/1.29  % Current options:
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ 
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % 
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 4.24/1.29  % 
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.24/1.29  
% 4.24/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------