↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SWV152+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:20:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.35s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  18   ~;  12   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  17   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0002,conjecture,
    ! [X14] :
      ( ( leq(n0,X14)
        & leq(X14,tptp_minus_1) )
     => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X14,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0002) ).

fof(leq_gt1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( gt(X2,X1)
     => leq(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt1) ).

fof(transitivity_leq,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( leq(X1,X2)
        & leq(X2,X3) )
     => leq(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',transitivity_leq) ).

fof(finite_domain_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( leq(n0,X1)
        & leq(X1,n0) )
     => X1 = n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',finite_domain_0) ).

fof(gt_0_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    gt(n0,tptp_minus_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',gt_0_tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(irreflexivity_gt,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ gt(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',irreflexivity_gt) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X14] :
        ( ( leq(n0,X14)
          & leq(X14,tptp_minus_1) )
       => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X14,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0002]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X211,X212] :
      ( ~ gt(X212,X211)
      | leq(X211,X212) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_gt1])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X204,X205,X206] :
      ( ~ leq(X204,X205)
      | ~ leq(X205,X206)
      | leq(X204,X206) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[transitivity_leq])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(n0,esk24_0)
    & leq(esk24_0,tptp_minus_1)
    & sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,esk24_0,tptp_sum_index)) != n1 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X358] :
      ( ~ leq(n0,X358)
      | ~ leq(X358,n0)
      | X358 = n0 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[finite_domain_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( leq(X2,X1)
    | ~ gt(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    gt(n0,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[gt_0_tptp_minus_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X3)
    | ~ leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk24_0,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( X1 = n0
    | ~ leq(n0,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,n0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    leq(tptp_minus_1,n0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(X1,tptp_minus_1)
    | ~ leq(X1,esk24_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk24_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ gt(X1,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexivity_gt]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( tptp_minus_1 = n0
    | ~ leq(n0,tptp_minus_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X202] : ~ gt(X202,X202),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    tptp_minus_1 = n0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ~ gt(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWV152+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 04:56:31 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.35/1.73  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.35/1.73  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.35/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.35/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.35/1.73  % Total time : 1.373s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------