%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV154+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:53:50 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 18 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 7 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 28 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 20 ( 20 usr; 12 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0004,conjecture,
( ( ! [X18] :
( ( leq(X18,pred(pv10))
& leq(n0,X18) )
=> sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X18,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 )
& ! [X14] :
( ( leq(X14,pred(pv12))
& leq(n0,X14) )
=> a_select3(q,pv10,X14) = divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,X14,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,X14,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) )
& leq(pv12,n4)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& leq(n0,pv12)
& leq(n0,pv10)
& pv70 = sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10))))) )
=> ! [X4] :
( ( leq(X4,pv12)
& leq(n0,X4) )
=> ( pv12 = X4
=> divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,pv12,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,pv12,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),pv70) = divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,X4,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,X4,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0004) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X18] :
( ( leq(X18,pred(pv10))
& leq(n0,X18) )
=> sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X18,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 )
& ! [X14] :
( ( leq(X14,pred(pv12))
& leq(n0,X14) )
=> a_select3(q,pv10,X14) = divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,X14,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,X14,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) )
& leq(pv12,n4)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& leq(n0,pv12)
& leq(n0,pv10)
& pv70 = sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10))))) )
=> ! [X4] :
( ( leq(X4,pv12)
& leq(n0,X4) )
=> ( pv12 = X4
=> divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,pv12,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,pv12,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),pv70) = divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,X4,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,X4,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0004]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X186,X187] :
( divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,pv12,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,pv12,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),pv70) != divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,esk24_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,esk24_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10))))))
& pv12 = esk24_0
& leq(esk24_0,pv12)
& leq(n0,esk24_0)
& ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X187,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
| ~ leq(X187,pred(pv10))
| ~ leq(n0,X187) )
& ( a_select3(q,pv10,X186) = divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,X186,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,X186,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10))))))
| ~ leq(X186,pred(pv12))
| ~ leq(n0,X186) )
& leq(pv12,n4)
& leq(pv10,n135299)
& leq(n0,pv12)
& leq(n0,pv10)
& pv70 = sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10))))) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,pv12,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,pv12,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),pv70) != divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,esk24_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,esk24_0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
pv12 = esk24_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
pv70 = sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV154+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:36:36 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1053303 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 1053316 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.14/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Initial clauses : 210
% 0.14/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.14/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 208
% 0.14/0.45 % Processed clauses : 68
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.14/0.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 65
% 0.14/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.14/0.45 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.14/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 64
% 0.14/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 45
% 0.14/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.14/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 141
% 0.14/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 732
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.14/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
% 0.14/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.14/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.14/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.14/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.14/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 14255
% 0.14/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2330
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.45 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4004 pages
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % User time : 0.029 s
% 0.14/0.45 % System time : 0.023 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Total time : 0.052 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------