%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SWV155+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:27 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 1.09s 1.31s % Output : Refutation 1.09s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV155+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:01:59 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 1.09/1.31 % 1.09/1.31 SPASS V 3.9 % 1.09/1.31 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 1.09/1.31 % SZS status Theorem % 1.09/1.31 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.09/1.31 SPASS derived 4485 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 2199 clauses. % 1.09/1.31 SPASS allocated 89424 KBytes. % 1.09/1.31 SPASS spent 0:00:00.94 on the problem. % 1.09/1.31 0:00:00.03 for the input. % 1.09/1.31 0:00:00.05 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 1.09/1.31 0:00:00.03 for inferences. % 1.09/1.31 0:00:00.02 for the backtracking. % 1.09/1.31 0:00:00.68 for the reduction. % 1.09/1.31 % 1.09/1.31 % 1.09/1.31 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 7 : % 1.09/1.31 % SZS output start Refutation % 1.09/1.31 2[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc1)*r. % 1.09/1.31 36[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc1,pred(pv10))*r. % 1.09/1.31 103[0:Inp] || equal(sum__dfg(n0,n4,a_select3(q,skc1,tptp_sum_index)),n1)** -> . % 1.09/1.31 118[0:Inp] || leq(u,pred(pv10)) leq(n0,u) -> equal(sum__dfg(n0,n4,a_select3(q,u,tptp_sum_index)),n1)**. % 1.09/1.31 6097[0:SpL:118.2,103.0] || leq(skc1,pred(pv10))*r leq(n0,skc1) equal(n1,n1) -> . % 1.09/1.31 6098[0:Obv:6097.2] || leq(skc1,pred(pv10))*r leq(n0,skc1) -> . % 1.09/1.31 6099[0:MRR:6098.0,6098.1,36.0,2.0] || -> . % 1.09/1.31 % SZS output end Refutation % 1.09/1.31 Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_norm_0005 % 1.09/1.31 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------