%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SWV159+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:28 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 1.17s 1.34s % Output : Refutation 1.17s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SWV159+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 04:14:56 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : % 1.17/1.34 % 1.17/1.34 SPASS V 3.9 % 1.17/1.34 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 1.17/1.34 % SZS status Theorem % 1.17/1.34 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.17/1.34 SPASS derived 4379 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 2204 clauses. % 1.17/1.34 SPASS allocated 89421 KBytes. % 1.17/1.34 SPASS spent 0:00:00.96 on the problem. % 1.17/1.34 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 1.17/1.34 0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 1.17/1.34 0:00:00.03 for inferences. % 1.17/1.34 0:00:00.02 for the backtracking. % 1.17/1.34 0:00:00.66 for the reduction. % 1.17/1.34 % 1.17/1.34 % 1.17/1.34 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 7 : % 1.17/1.34 % SZS output start Refutation % 1.17/1.34 2[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc1)*r. % 1.17/1.34 44[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc1,pred(pv10))*r. % 1.17/1.34 111[0:Inp] || equal(sum__dfg(n0,n4,a_select3(q,skc1,tptp_sum_index)),n1)** -> . % 1.17/1.34 126[0:Inp] || leq(u,pred(pv10)) leq(n0,u) -> equal(sum__dfg(n0,n4,a_select3(q,u,tptp_sum_index)),n1)**. % 1.17/1.34 5899[0:SpL:126.2,111.0] || leq(skc1,pred(pv10))*r leq(n0,skc1) equal(n1,n1) -> . % 1.17/1.34 5900[0:Obv:5899.2] || leq(skc1,pred(pv10))*r leq(n0,skc1) -> . % 1.17/1.34 5901[0:MRR:5900.0,5900.1,44.0,2.0] || -> . % 1.17/1.34 % SZS output end Refutation % 1.17/1.34 Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_norm_0009 % 1.17/1.34 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------