↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV163+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:06:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.25s 1.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  15   ~;  10   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;  11 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0 sgn  12   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(irreflexivity_gt,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ gt(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',irreflexivity_gt) ).

fof(leq_succ,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( leq(X,Y)
     => leq(X,succ(Y)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_succ) ).

fof(leq_succ_gt_equiv,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( leq(X,Y)
    <=> gt(succ(Y),X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_succ_gt_equiv) ).

fof(finite_domain_0,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( leq(X,n0)
        & leq(n0,X) )
     => X = n0 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',finite_domain_0) ).

fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0013,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A] :
          ( ( leq(A,pred(pv10))
            & leq(n0,A) )
         => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,A,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 )
      & leq(pv10,n135299)
      & leq(n0,pv10) )
   => ! [B] :
        ( ( leq(B,tptp_minus_1)
          & leq(n0,B) )
       => a_select3(q,pv10,B) = divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,B,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,B,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0013) ).

fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0013_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A] :
            ( ( leq(A,pred(pv10))
              & leq(n0,A) )
           => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,A,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 )
        & leq(pv10,n135299)
        & leq(n0,pv10) )
     => ! [B] :
          ( ( leq(B,tptp_minus_1)
            & leq(n0,B) )
         => a_select3(q,pv10,B) = divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,B,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,B,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0013]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    ~ gt(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[irreflexivity_gt]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    ( leq(A,succ(B))
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_succ]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ( gt(succ(B),A)
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_succ_gt_equiv]) ).

fof(succ_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',succ_tptp_minus_1) ).

cnf(c_281,plain,
    succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[succ_tptp_minus_1]) ).

cnf(c_352,plain,
    ( n0 = A
    | ~ leq(A,n0)
    | ~ leq(n0,A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[finite_domain_0]) ).

fof(nnf_56,plain,
    ( ? [B] :
        ( divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,B,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,B,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) != a_select3(q,pv10,B)
        & leq(B,tptp_minus_1)
        & leq(n0,B) )
    & ! [A] :
        ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,A,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
        | ~ leq(A,pred(pv10))
        | ~ leq(n0,A) )
    & leq(pv10,n135299)
    & leq(n0,pv10) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0013_neg]) ).

fof(sk_cl5_nebula_norm_0013_neg,plain,
    ( divide(sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,sK0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,sK0,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))),sum(n0,n4,sqrt(times(minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)),minus(a_select3(center,tptp_sum_index,n0),a_select2(x,pv10)))))) != a_select3(q,pv10,sK0)
    & leq(sK0,tptp_minus_1)
    & leq(n0,sK0)
    & ! [A] :
        ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,A,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
        | ~ leq(A,pred(pv10))
        | ~ leq(n0,A) )
    & leq(pv10,n135299)
    & leq(n0,pv10) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(B,sK0)],[nnf_56]) ).

cnf(c_368,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_cl5_nebula_norm_0013_neg]) ).

cnf(c_369,negated_conjecture,
    leq(sK0,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_cl5_nebula_norm_0013_neg]) ).

cnf(c_2554,negated_conjecture,
    ( n0 = sK0
    | ~ leq(sK0,n0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_368,c_352]) ).

cnf(c_1897,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK0 = n0
    | ~ leq(sK0,n0) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2554]) ).

cnf(c_2555,negated_conjecture,
    gt(succ(tptp_minus_1),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_369,c_72]) ).

cnf(c_2371,negated_conjecture,
    gt(n0,sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_281,c_2555]) ).

cnf(c_2556,negated_conjecture,
    leq(sK0,succ(tptp_minus_1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_369,c_71]) ).

cnf(c_2372,negated_conjecture,
    leq(sK0,n0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_281,c_2556]) ).

cnf(c_2513,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 = n0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2372,c_1897]) ).

cnf(c_2557,negated_conjecture,
    gt(n0,n0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2513,c_2371]) ).

cnf(c_2553,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_2557]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV163+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:18:18 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.35  % Process 1670746 was started by sandbox2 on n020,
% 0.10/0.35  % Sat Sep 26 13:18:18 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 8.25/1.64  
% 8.25/1.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 8.25/1.64  
% 8.25/1.64  % Proof 1 at 1.00 (+ 0.19) seconds.
% 8.25/1.64  % Length of proof is 17.
% 8.25/1.64  % Level of proof is 4.
% 8.25/1.64  % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 8.25/1.64  % Given clauses 295.
% 8.25/1.64  
% 8.25/1.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------