↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV164+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:06:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.25s 1.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   57 (  17   ~;  12   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   27 (  27 usr;  16 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn  14   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(irreflexivity_gt,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ gt(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',irreflexivity_gt) ).

fof(leq_succ,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( leq(X,Y)
     => leq(X,succ(Y)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_succ) ).

fof(leq_succ_gt_equiv,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( leq(X,Y)
    <=> gt(succ(Y),X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_succ_gt_equiv) ).

fof(succ_plus_1_r,axiom,
    ! [X] : plus(X,n1) = succ(X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',succ_plus_1_r) ).

fof(succ_plus_1_l,axiom,
    ! [X] : plus(n1,X) = succ(X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',succ_plus_1_l) ).

fof(finite_domain_0,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( leq(X,n0)
        & leq(n0,X) )
     => X = n0 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',finite_domain_0) ).

fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0014,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A] :
          ( ( leq(A,pred(pv10))
            & leq(n0,A) )
         => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,A,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 )
      & leq(pv10,n135299)
      & leq(n0,pv10) )
   => ! [B] :
        ( ( leq(B,tptp_minus_1)
          & leq(n0,B) )
       => a_select3(q,pv10,B) = divide(divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,B)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,B))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,B),a_select2(sigma,B)))),a_select2(rho,B)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,B))),sum(n0,n4,divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index)))),a_select2(rho,tptp_sum_index)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index))))) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0014) ).

fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0014_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A] :
            ( ( leq(A,pred(pv10))
              & leq(n0,A) )
           => sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,A,tptp_sum_index)) = n1 )
        & leq(pv10,n135299)
        & leq(n0,pv10) )
     => ! [B] :
          ( ( leq(B,tptp_minus_1)
            & leq(n0,B) )
         => a_select3(q,pv10,B) = divide(divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,B)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,B))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,B),a_select2(sigma,B)))),a_select2(rho,B)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,B))),sum(n0,n4,divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index)))),a_select2(rho,tptp_sum_index)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index))))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0014]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    ~ gt(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[irreflexivity_gt]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    ( leq(A,succ(B))
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_succ]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ( gt(succ(B),A)
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_succ_gt_equiv]) ).

fof(succ_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',succ_tptp_minus_1) ).

cnf(c_281,plain,
    succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[succ_tptp_minus_1]) ).

cnf(c_282,plain,
    plus(A,n1) = succ(A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[succ_plus_1_r]) ).

cnf(c_283,plain,
    succ(A) = plus(A,n1),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_282]) ).

cnf(c_284,plain,
    plus(n1,A) = succ(A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[succ_plus_1_l]) ).

cnf(c_285,plain,
    plus(n1,A) = plus(A,n1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_284]) ).

cnf(c_368,plain,
    ( n0 = A
    | ~ leq(A,n0)
    | ~ leq(n0,A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[finite_domain_0]) ).

fof(nnf_56,plain,
    ( ? [B] :
        ( divide(divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,B)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,B))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,B),a_select2(sigma,B)))),a_select2(rho,B)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,B))),sum(n0,n4,divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index)))),a_select2(rho,tptp_sum_index)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index))))) != a_select3(q,pv10,B)
        & leq(B,tptp_minus_1)
        & leq(n0,B) )
    & ! [A] :
        ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,A,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
        | ~ leq(A,pred(pv10))
        | ~ leq(n0,A) )
    & leq(pv10,n135299)
    & leq(n0,pv10) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0014_neg]) ).

fof(sk_cl5_nebula_norm_0014_neg,plain,
    ( divide(divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,sK0)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,sK0))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,sK0),a_select2(sigma,sK0)))),a_select2(rho,sK0)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,sK0))),sum(n0,n4,divide(times(exp(divide(divide(times(minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index)),minus(a_select2(x,pv10),a_select2(mu,tptp_sum_index))),tptp_minus_2),times(a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index)))),a_select2(rho,tptp_sum_index)),times(sqrt(times(n2,tptp_pi)),a_select2(sigma,tptp_sum_index))))) != a_select3(q,pv10,sK0)
    & leq(sK0,tptp_minus_1)
    & leq(n0,sK0)
    & ! [A] :
        ( sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,A,tptp_sum_index)) = n1
        | ~ leq(A,pred(pv10))
        | ~ leq(n0,A) )
    & leq(pv10,n135299)
    & leq(n0,pv10) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(B,sK0)],[nnf_56]) ).

cnf(c_386,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_cl5_nebula_norm_0014_neg]) ).

cnf(c_387,negated_conjecture,
    leq(sK0,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_cl5_nebula_norm_0014_neg]) ).

cnf(c_2785,plain,
    plus(tptp_minus_1,n1) = n0,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_281]) ).

cnf(c_821,plain,
    plus(n1,tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_2785]) ).

cnf(c_823,plain,
    ( gt(plus(B,n1),A)
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_72]) ).

cnf(c_824,plain,
    ( leq(A,plus(B,n1))
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_71]) ).

cnf(c_2786,negated_conjecture,
    ( n0 = sK0
    | ~ leq(sK0,n0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_386,c_368]) ).

cnf(c_1922,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK0 = n0
    | ~ leq(sK0,n0) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2786]) ).

cnf(c_2787,negated_conjecture,
    gt(plus(tptp_minus_1,n1),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_823,c_387]) ).

cnf(c_2788,negated_conjecture,
    gt(plus(n1,tptp_minus_1),sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_2787]) ).

cnf(c_2677,negated_conjecture,
    gt(n0,sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_821,c_2788]) ).

cnf(c_2789,negated_conjecture,
    leq(sK0,plus(tptp_minus_1,n1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_824,c_387]) ).

cnf(c_2790,negated_conjecture,
    leq(sK0,plus(n1,tptp_minus_1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_2789]) ).

cnf(c_2681,negated_conjecture,
    leq(sK0,n0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_821,c_2790]) ).

cnf(c_2783,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 = n0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2681,c_1922]) ).

cnf(c_2791,negated_conjecture,
    gt(n0,n0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2783,c_2677]) ).

cnf(c_2784,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_2791]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SWV164+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.02/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.02/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.02/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.02/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.02/0.30  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:17:04 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.30  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.02/0.30  % Process 693510 was started by sandbox2 on n012,
% 0.02/0.30  % Sat Sep 26 13:17:04 2026
% 0.02/0.30  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.33  
% 0.08/0.33  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 5.25/1.05  
% 5.25/1.05  % given #500 (I,wt=158): 592 leq(n0,f19(A,B,C,D,E,F,V6,V7)) | leq(n0,f22(A,B,C,D,E,F,V6,V7)) | leq(n0,f23(A,B,C,D,E,F,V6,V7)) | -leq(n0,V6) | a_select3(tptp_madd(A,tptp_mmul(B,tptp_mmul(tptp_madd(tptp_mmul(C,tptp_mmul(D,trans(C))),tptp_mmul(E,tptp_mmul(F,trans(E)))),trans(B)))),n0,V6) = a_select3(tptp_madd(A,tptp_mmul(B,tptp_mmul(tptp_madd(tptp_mmul(C,tptp_mmul(D,trans(C))),tptp_mmul(E,tptp_mmul(F,trans(E)))),trans(B)))),V6,n0).  [factor(163,d,g),unit_del(e,64),unit_del(f,64)].
% 5.25/1.05  
% 5.25/1.05  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 5.25/1.05  
% 5.25/1.05  % Proof 1 at 0.64 (+ 0.07) seconds.
% 5.25/1.05  % Length of proof is 26.
% 5.25/1.05  % Level of proof is 7.
% 5.25/1.05  % Maximum clause weight is 18.000.
% 5.25/1.05  % Given clauses 732.
% 5.25/1.05  
% 5.25/1.05  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------