↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV165+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.64s 2.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   34 (   5 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mhnjo0tn/lgb.p',i_0_35) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    gt(n0,tptp_minus_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mhnjo0tn/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_162,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X3,X2)
    | ~ leq(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mhnjo0tn/lgb.p',i_0_162) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,tptp_minus_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mhnjo0tn/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( X1 = n0
    | ~ leq(X1,n0)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mhnjo0tn/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mhnjo0tn/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_34,plain,
    ~ gt(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mhnjo0tn/lgb.p',i_0_34) ).

cnf(c_0_170,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ gt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_171,plain,
    gt(n0,tptp_minus_1),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_172,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X3,X2)
    | ~ leq(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_162 ).

cnf(c_0_173,plain,
    leq(tptp_minus_1,n0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_170,c_0_171]) ).

cnf(c_0_174,plain,
    ( leq(X1,n0)
    | ~ leq(X1,tptp_minus_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_172,c_0_173]) ).

cnf(c_0_175,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,tptp_minus_1),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_176,plain,
    ( X1 = n0
    | ~ leq(X1,n0)
    | ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_177,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk1_0,n0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_174,c_0_175]) ).

cnf(c_0_178,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,esk1_0),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_179,plain,
    esk1_0 = n0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_176,c_0_177]),c_0_178])]) ).

cnf(c_0_180,plain,
    ( tptp_minus_1 = n0
    | ~ leq(n0,tptp_minus_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_176,c_0_173]) ).

cnf(c_0_181,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_175,c_0_179]) ).

cnf(c_0_182,plain,
    tptp_minus_1 = n0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_180,c_0_181])]) ).

cnf(c_0_183,plain,
    ~ gt(X1,X1),
    i_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_184,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_171,c_0_182]),c_0_183]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SWV165+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 10:57:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.64/2.37  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.64/2.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.64/2.37  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.64/2.37  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.64/2.37  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.64/2.37  #
% 7.64/2.37  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 7.64/2.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.64/2.37  
% 7.64/2.37  # Proof found!
% 7.64/2.37  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.64/2.37  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.64/2.37  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.64/2.37  
% 7.64/2.37  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.64/2.37  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 7.64/2.37  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 7.64/2.37  # Total time               : 0.035 s
% 7.64/2.37  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.64/2.37  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------