%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWV169+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.40s 2.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 5 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_171,plain,
( a_select3(center_init,X1,n0) = init
| ~ epred1_0
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h57etvab/lgb.p',i_0_171) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h57etvab/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_175,plain,
( leq(pv65,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h57etvab/lgb.p',i_0_175) ).
cnf(i_0_178,plain,
( leq(n0,pv65)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h57etvab/lgb.p',i_0_178) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
a_select3(center_init,pv65,n0) != init,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h57etvab/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(c_0_184,plain,
( a_select3(center_init,X1,n0) = init
| ~ epred1_0
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
i_0_171 ).
cnf(c_0_185,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_186,plain,
( leq(pv65,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
i_0_175 ).
cnf(c_0_187,plain,
( leq(n0,pv65)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
i_0_178 ).
cnf(c_0_188,negated_conjecture,
a_select3(center_init,pv65,n0) != init,
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_189,plain,
( a_select3(center_init,X1,n0) = init
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_184,c_0_185])]) ).
cnf(c_0_190,plain,
leq(pv65,n4),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_186,c_0_185])]) ).
cnf(c_0_191,plain,
leq(n0,pv65),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_187,c_0_185])]) ).
cnf(c_0_192,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_188,c_0_189]),c_0_190]),c_0_191])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWV169+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:43:45 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.49 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.40/2.47 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.40/2.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.40/2.47 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.40/2.47 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.40/2.47 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.40/2.47 #
% 7.40/2.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.40/2.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.40/2.47
% 7.40/2.47 # Proof found!
% 7.40/2.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.40/2.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.40/2.47 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.40/2.47
% 7.40/2.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.40/2.47 # User time : 0.026 s
% 7.40/2.47 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.40/2.47 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 7.40/2.47 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.40/2.47
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------