%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWV171+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.77s 2.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 5 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_175,plain,
( a_select2(sigma_init,X1) = init
| ~ epred1_0
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-445dusve/lgb.p',i_0_175) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-445dusve/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_180,plain,
( leq(pv52,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-445dusve/lgb.p',i_0_180) ).
cnf(i_0_183,plain,
( leq(n0,pv52)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-445dusve/lgb.p',i_0_183) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
a_select2(sigma_init,pv52) != init,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-445dusve/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(c_0_189,plain,
( a_select2(sigma_init,X1) = init
| ~ epred1_0
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
i_0_175 ).
cnf(c_0_190,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_191,plain,
( leq(pv52,n4)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
i_0_180 ).
cnf(c_0_192,plain,
( leq(n0,pv52)
| ~ epred1_0 ),
i_0_183 ).
cnf(c_0_193,negated_conjecture,
a_select2(sigma_init,pv52) != init,
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_194,plain,
( a_select2(sigma_init,X1) = init
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_189,c_0_190])]) ).
cnf(c_0_195,plain,
leq(pv52,n4),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_191,c_0_190])]) ).
cnf(c_0_196,plain,
leq(n0,pv52),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_192,c_0_190])]) ).
cnf(c_0_197,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_193,c_0_194]),c_0_195]),c_0_196])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWV171+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 23:16:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.77/2.53 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.77/2.53 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.77/2.53 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.77/2.53 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.77/2.53 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.77/2.53 #
% 8.77/2.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 8.77/2.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.77/2.53
% 8.77/2.53 # Proof found!
% 8.77/2.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.77/2.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.77/2.53 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.77/2.53
% 8.77/2.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.77/2.53 # User time : 0.013 s
% 8.77/2.53 # System time : 0.004 s
% 8.77/2.53 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 8.77/2.53 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.77/2.53
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------