%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SWV173+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:31 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.38s 0.57s % Output : Refutation 0.38s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SWV173+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % 0.04/0.15 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 15:26:56 EDT 2022 % 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime : % 0.38/0.57 % 0.38/0.57 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.38/0.57 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.38/0.57 % SZS status Theorem % 0.38/0.57 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.38/0.57 SPASS derived 259 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 177 clauses. % 0.38/0.57 SPASS allocated 85935 KBytes. % 0.38/0.57 SPASS spent 0:00:00.18 on the problem. % 0.38/0.57 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 0.38/0.57 0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.38/0.57 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.38/0.57 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.38/0.57 0:00:00.02 for the reduction. % 0.38/0.57 % 0.38/0.57 % 0.38/0.57 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 : % 0.38/0.57 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.38/0.57 2[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc1)*r. % 0.38/0.57 5[0:Inp] || -> gt(loopcounter,n1)*r. % 0.38/0.57 6[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc1,n4)*l. % 0.38/0.57 60[0:Inp] || equal(a_select2(rhoold_init,skc1),init)** -> . % 0.38/0.57 119[0:Inp] || gt(loopcounter,n1) leq(n0,u) leq(u,n4) -> equal(a_select2(rhoold_init,u),init)**. % 0.38/0.57 169[0:MRR:119.0,5.0] || leq(u,n4) leq(n0,u) -> equal(a_select2(rhoold_init,u),init)**. % 0.38/0.57 231[0:Res:6.0,169.1] || leq(n0,skc1) -> equal(a_select2(rhoold_init,skc1),init)**. % 0.38/0.57 436[0:MRR:231.0,231.1,2.0,60.0] || -> . % 0.38/0.57 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.38/0.57 Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_init_0041 % 0.38/0.57 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------