%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SWV174+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:31 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.77s 0.93s % Output : Refutation 0.77s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV174+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 12:38:39 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.77/0.93 % 0.77/0.93 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.77/0.93 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.77/0.93 % SZS status Theorem % 0.77/0.93 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.77/0.93 SPASS derived 2276 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 953 clauses. % 0.77/0.93 SPASS allocated 87716 KBytes. % 0.77/0.93 SPASS spent 0:00:00.55 on the problem. % 0.77/0.93 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 0.77/0.93 0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.77/0.93 0:00:00.02 for inferences. % 0.77/0.93 0:00:00.01 for the backtracking. % 0.77/0.93 0:00:00.29 for the reduction. % 0.77/0.93 % 0.77/0.93 % 0.77/0.93 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 11 : % 0.77/0.93 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.77/0.93 2[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc3)*r. % 0.77/0.93 4[0:Inp] || -> gt(pv10,skc3)*r. % 0.77/0.93 7[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc2,n4)*l. % 0.77/0.93 8[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc2)*r. % 0.77/0.93 69[0:Inp] || equal(a_select3(q_init,skc3,skc2),init)** -> . % 0.77/0.93 82[0:Inp] || gt(u,v)*+ -> leq(v,pred(u))*. % 0.77/0.93 125[0:Inp] || leq(u,n4) leq(v,pred(pv10)) leq(n0,u) leq(n0,v) -> equal(a_select3(q_init,v,u),init)**. % 0.77/0.93 164[0:Res:125.4,69.0] || leq(n0,skc3) leq(skc3,pred(pv10))*r leq(n0,skc2) leq(skc2,n4) -> . % 0.77/0.93 362[0:MRR:164.0,164.2,164.3,2.0,8.0,7.0] || leq(skc3,pred(pv10))*r -> . % 0.77/0.93 3237[0:Res:4.0,82.0] || -> leq(skc3,pred(pv10))*r. % 0.77/0.93 3366[0:MRR:3237.0,362.0] || -> . % 0.77/0.93 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.77/0.93 Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_init_0046 leq_gt_pred % 0.77/0.93 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------