%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV175+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.74s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 19 unt; 1 def)
% Number of atoms : 163 ( 41 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 28 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 187 ( 60 ~; 53 |; 52 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 22 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 14 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 0 sgn 36 !; 0 ?; 6 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( ( gt(loopcounter,n1)
=> ! [X6] :
( ( leq(X6,n4)
& leq(n0,X6) )
=> a_select2(sigmaold_init,X6) = init ) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n1)
=> ! [X5] :
( ( leq(X5,n4)
& leq(n0,X5) )
=> a_select2(rhoold_init,X5) = init ) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n1)
=> ! [X4] :
( ( leq(X4,n4)
& leq(n0,X4) )
=> a_select2(muold_init,X4) = init ) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( leq(X3,n4)
& leq(n0,X3) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X3,n0) = init )
& ! [X2] :
( ( leq(X2,pred(pv28))
& leq(n0,X2) )
=> a_select2(rho_init,X2) = init )
& ! [X0] :
( ( leq(X0,n135299)
& leq(n0,X0) )
=> ! [X1] :
( ( leq(X1,n4)
& leq(n0,X1) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X0,X1) = init ) )
& leq(pv30,n135299)
& leq(pv28,n4)
& leq(n0,pv30)
& leq(n0,pv28) )
=> a_select3(q_init,pv30,pv28) = init ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_init_0051) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ( gt(loopcounter,n1)
=> ! [X6] :
( ( leq(X6,n4)
& leq(n0,X6) )
=> a_select2(sigmaold_init,X6) = init ) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n1)
=> ! [X5] :
( ( leq(X5,n4)
& leq(n0,X5) )
=> a_select2(rhoold_init,X5) = init ) )
& ( gt(loopcounter,n1)
=> ! [X4] :
( ( leq(X4,n4)
& leq(n0,X4) )
=> a_select2(muold_init,X4) = init ) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( leq(X3,n4)
& leq(n0,X3) )
=> a_select3(center_init,X3,n0) = init )
& ! [X2] :
( ( leq(X2,pred(pv28))
& leq(n0,X2) )
=> a_select2(rho_init,X2) = init )
& ! [X0] :
( ( leq(X0,n135299)
& leq(n0,X0) )
=> ! [X1] :
( ( leq(X1,n4)
& leq(n0,X1) )
=> a_select3(q_init,X0,X1) = init ) )
& leq(pv30,n135299)
& leq(pv28,n4)
& leq(n0,pv30)
& leq(n0,pv28) )
=> a_select3(q_init,pv30,pv28) = init ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).
fof(f143,plain,
( ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n1)
| ! [X6] :
( ~ leq(X6,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X6)
| a_select2(sigmaold_init,X6) = init ) )
& ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n1)
| ! [X5] :
( ~ leq(X5,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X5)
| a_select2(rhoold_init,X5) = init ) )
& ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n1)
| ! [X4] :
( ~ leq(X4,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X4)
| a_select2(muold_init,X4) = init ) )
& ! [X3] :
( ~ leq(X3,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X3)
| a_select3(center_init,X3,n0) = init )
& ! [X2] :
( ~ leq(X2,pred(pv28))
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| a_select2(rho_init,X2) = init )
& ! [X0] :
( ~ leq(X0,n135299)
| ~ leq(n0,X0)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| a_select3(q_init,X0,X1) = init ) )
& leq(pv30,n135299)
& leq(pv28,n4)
& leq(n0,pv30)
& leq(n0,pv28)
& init != a_select3(q_init,pv30,pv28) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f144,plain,
( ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n1)
| ! [X6] :
( ~ leq(X6,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X6)
| a_select2(sigmaold_init,X6) = init ) )
& ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n1)
| ! [X5] :
( ~ leq(X5,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X5)
| a_select2(rhoold_init,X5) = init ) )
& ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n1)
| ! [X4] :
( ~ leq(X4,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X4)
| a_select2(muold_init,X4) = init ) )
& ! [X3] :
( ~ leq(X3,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X3)
| a_select3(center_init,X3,n0) = init )
& ! [X2] :
( ~ leq(X2,pred(pv28))
| ~ leq(n0,X2)
| a_select2(rho_init,X2) = init )
& ! [X0] :
( ~ leq(X0,n135299)
| ~ leq(n0,X0)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| a_select3(q_init,X0,X1) = init ) )
& leq(pv30,n135299)
& leq(pv28,n4)
& leq(n0,pv30)
& leq(n0,pv28)
& init != a_select3(q_init,pv30,pv28) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f143]) ).
fof(f312,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ leq(X0,n135299)
| ~ leq(n0,X0)
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| a_select3(q_init,X0,X1) = init ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).
fof(f313,plain,
leq(pv30,n135299),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).
fof(f314,plain,
leq(pv28,n4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).
fof(f315,plain,
leq(n0,pv30),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).
fof(f316,plain,
leq(n0,pv28),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).
fof(f317,plain,
init != a_select3(q_init,pv30,pv28),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).
tcf(c_157,negated_conjecture,
a_select3(q_init,pv30,pv28) != init,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f317]) ).
tcf(c_158,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv28),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f316]) ).
tcf(c_159,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv30),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f315]) ).
tcf(c_160,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv28,n4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f314]) ).
tcf(c_161,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv30,n135299),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f313]) ).
tcf(c_162,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( a_select3(q_init,X0,X1) = init )
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(n0,X0)
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(X0,n135299) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f312]) ).
tcf(c_5938,definition,
iPr_def_11 = a_select3(q_init,pv30,pv28),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_5944,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( a_select3(q_init,X0,X1) = init )
| ~ leq(n0,X1)
| ~ leq(n0,X0)
| ~ leq(X1,n4)
| ~ leq(X0,n135299) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_162]) ).
tcf(c_5945,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv30,n135299),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_161]) ).
tcf(c_5946,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv28,n4),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_160]) ).
tcf(c_5947,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv30),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_159]) ).
tcf(c_5948,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv28),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_158]) ).
tcf(c_5949,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_11 != init,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_157,c_5938]) ).
tcf(c_9053,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( a_select3(q_init,pv30,X0) = init )
| ~ leq(pv30,n135299)
| ~ leq(n0,X0)
| ~ leq(X0,n4) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5947,c_5944]) ).
tcf(c_9054,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( a_select3(q_init,pv30,X0) = init )
| ~ leq(n0,X0)
| ~ leq(X0,n4) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9053,c_5945]) ).
tcf(c_9143,plain,
( ( a_select3(q_init,pv30,pv28) = init )
| ~ leq(pv28,n4) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5948,c_9054]) ).
tcf(c_9147,plain,
( ( init = iPr_def_11 )
| ~ leq(pv28,n4) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_9143,c_5938]) ).
tcf(c_9148,plain,
init = iPr_def_11,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9147,c_5946]) ).
tcf(c_9173,plain,
iPr_def_11 != iPr_def_11,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5949,c_9148]) ).
tcf(c_9174,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_9173]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV175+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.37 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:41:13 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.42
% 0.09/0.42 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.42
% 0.09/0.42 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.43 % Proving...
% 3.74/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.74/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ iProver source info
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.74/1.19 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.74/1.19 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ Parsing...
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 15 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ Proving...
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ Problem Properties
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 %
% 3.74/1.19 % clauses 160
% 3.74/1.19 % conjectures 11
% 3.74/1.19 % EPR 48
% 3.74/1.19 % Horn 110
% 3.74/1.19 % unary 60
% 3.74/1.19 % binary 34
% 3.74/1.19 % lits 516
% 3.74/1.19 % lits eq 122
% 3.74/1.19 % fd_pure 0
% 3.74/1.19 % fd_pseudo 0
% 3.74/1.19 % fd_cond 6
% 3.74/1.19 % fd_pseudo_cond 4
% 3.74/1.19 % AC symbols 0
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % ------
% 3.74/1.19 % Current options:
% 3.74/1.19 % ------
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 %
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % ------ Proving...
% 3.74/1.19 %
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.74/1.19
% 3.74/1.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------