↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV181+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:06:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 27.45s 3.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 27.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   26 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   76 (  12   ~;   9   |;  29   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  25  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  14 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(irreflexivity_gt,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ gt(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',irreflexivity_gt) ).

fof(leq_gt1,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( gt(Y,X)
     => leq(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_gt1) ).

fof(leq_succ_gt_equiv,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( leq(X,Y)
    <=> gt(succ(Y),X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_succ_gt_equiv) ).

fof(leq_succ_gt,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( leq(succ(X),Y)
     => gt(Y,X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_succ_gt) ).

fof(finite_domain_0,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( leq(X,n0)
        & leq(n0,X) )
     => X = n0 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',finite_domain_0) ).

fof(cl5_nebula_init_0081,conjecture,
    ( ( ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
       => ! [F] :
            ( ( leq(F,n4)
              & leq(n0,F) )
           => a_select2(sigma_init,F) = init ) )
      & ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
       => ! [E] :
            ( ( leq(E,n4)
              & leq(n0,E) )
           => a_select2(rho_init,E) = init ) )
      & ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
       => ! [D] :
            ( ( leq(D,n4)
              & leq(n0,D) )
           => a_select2(mu_init,D) = init ) )
      & ! [C] :
          ( ( leq(C,n4)
            & leq(n0,C) )
         => a_select3(center_init,C,n0) = init )
      & ! [A] :
          ( ( leq(A,n135299)
            & leq(n0,A) )
         => ! [B] :
              ( ( leq(B,n4)
                & leq(n0,B) )
             => a_select3(q_init,A,B) = init ) )
      & gt(n1,loopcounter)
      & leq(n1,loopcounter)
      & leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv76) )
   => ! [G] :
        ( ( leq(G,n4)
          & leq(n0,G) )
       => a_select2(muold_init,G) = init ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_init_0081) ).

fof(cl5_nebula_init_0081_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
         => ! [F] :
              ( ( leq(F,n4)
                & leq(n0,F) )
             => a_select2(sigma_init,F) = init ) )
        & ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
         => ! [E] :
              ( ( leq(E,n4)
                & leq(n0,E) )
             => a_select2(rho_init,E) = init ) )
        & ( gt(loopcounter,n0)
         => ! [D] :
              ( ( leq(D,n4)
                & leq(n0,D) )
             => a_select2(mu_init,D) = init ) )
        & ! [C] :
            ( ( leq(C,n4)
              & leq(n0,C) )
           => a_select3(center_init,C,n0) = init )
        & ! [A] :
            ( ( leq(A,n135299)
              & leq(n0,A) )
           => ! [B] :
                ( ( leq(B,n4)
                  & leq(n0,B) )
               => a_select3(q_init,A,B) = init ) )
        & gt(n1,loopcounter)
        & leq(n1,loopcounter)
        & leq(tptp_float_0_001,pv76) )
     => ! [G] :
          ( ( leq(G,n4)
            & leq(n0,G) )
         => a_select2(muold_init,G) = init ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_init_0081]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    ~ gt(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[irreflexivity_gt]) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    ( leq(B,A)
    | ~ gt(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_gt1]) ).

cnf(c_73,plain,
    ( ~ gt(succ(B),A)
    | leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_succ_gt_equiv]) ).

cnf(c_307,plain,
    ( gt(B,A)
    | ~ leq(succ(A),B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_succ_gt]) ).

cnf(c_354,plain,
    ( n0 = A
    | ~ leq(A,n0)
    | ~ leq(n0,A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[finite_domain_0]) ).

fof(successor_1,axiom,
    succ(n0) = n1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',successor_1) ).

cnf(c_360,plain,
    succ(n0) = n1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[successor_1]) ).

cnf(c_364,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n1,loopcounter),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cl5_nebula_init_0081_neg]) ).

cnf(c_365,negated_conjecture,
    gt(n1,loopcounter),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cl5_nebula_init_0081_neg]) ).

cnf(c_1830,plain,
    ( ~ gt(n1,A)
    | leq(A,n0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_360,c_73]) ).

cnf(c_1844,plain,
    ( gt(A,n0)
    | ~ leq(n1,A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_360,c_307]) ).

cnf(c_16753,plain,
    leq(loopcounter,n0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1830,c_365]) ).

cnf(c_17938,plain,
    ( n0 = loopcounter
    | ~ leq(n0,loopcounter) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_16753,c_354]) ).

cnf(c_17025,plain,
    ( loopcounter = n0
    | ~ leq(n0,loopcounter) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_17938]) ).

cnf(c_17060,plain,
    gt(loopcounter,n0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1844,c_364]) ).

cnf(c_17069,plain,
    leq(n0,loopcounter),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17060,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_17091,plain,
    loopcounter = n0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17069,c_17025]) ).

cnf(c_17939,plain,
    gt(n0,n0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_17091,c_17060]) ).

cnf(c_17937,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_17939]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV181+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:18:48 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.36  % Process 1408165 was started by sandbox2 on n019,
% 0.09/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 13:18:48 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 27.45/3.97  
% 27.45/3.97  % given #500 (I,wt=131): 572 leq(n0,f19(A,B,C,D,E,F,n0,V6)) | leq(f21(A,B,C,D,E,F,n0,V6),n0) | leq(f24(A,B,C,D,E,F,n0,V6),n0) | -leq(n0,V7) | -leq(V7,n0) | a_select3(tptp_madd(A,tptp_mmul(B,tptp_mmul(tptp_madd(tptp_mmul(C,tptp_mmul(D,trans(C))),tptp_mmul(E,tptp_mmul(F,trans(E)))),trans(B)))),n0,V7) = a_select3(tptp_madd(A,tptp_mmul(B,tptp_mmul(tptp_madd(tptp_mmul(C,tptp_mmul(D,trans(C))),tptp_mmul(E,tptp_mmul(F,trans(E)))),trans(B)))),V7,n0).  [factor(161,d,e),flip(g),unit_del(d,64)].
% 27.45/3.97  
% 27.45/3.97  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 27.45/3.97  
% 27.45/3.97  % Proof 1 at 2.86 (+ 0.56) seconds.
% 27.45/3.97  % Length of proof is 22.
% 27.45/3.97  % Level of proof is 6.
% 27.45/3.97  % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 27.45/3.97  % Given clauses 941.
% 27.45/3.97  
% 27.45/3.97  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------