%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SWV189+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:34 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.52s % Output : Refutation 0.18s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV189+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 17:12:47 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.18/0.52 % 0.18/0.52 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.18/0.52 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.18/0.52 % SZS status Theorem % 0.18/0.52 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.18/0.52 SPASS derived 253 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 161 clauses. % 0.18/0.52 SPASS allocated 85905 KBytes. % 0.18/0.52 SPASS spent 0:00:00.17 on the problem. % 0.18/0.52 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 0.18/0.52 0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.18/0.52 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.18/0.52 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.18/0.52 0:00:00.01 for the reduction. % 0.18/0.52 % 0.18/0.52 % 0.18/0.52 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 15 : % 0.18/0.52 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.18/0.52 3[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc2)*r. % 0.18/0.52 4[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc2,tptp_minus_1)*l. % 0.18/0.52 29[0:Inp] || gt(u,u)* -> . % 0.18/0.52 31[0:Inp] || -> equal(succ(tptp_minus_1),n0)**. % 0.18/0.52 73[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* -> leq(u,succ(v))*. % 0.18/0.52 74[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* -> gt(succ(v),u)*. % 0.18/0.52 98[0:Inp] || leq(u,n0)* leq(n0,u)* -> equal(u,n0). % 0.18/0.52 239[0:Res:4.0,73.0] || -> leq(skc2,succ(tptp_minus_1))*r. % 0.18/0.52 240[0:Res:4.0,74.0] || -> gt(succ(tptp_minus_1),skc2)*l. % 0.18/0.52 299[0:Res:3.0,98.0] || leq(skc2,n0)*l -> equal(skc2,n0). % 0.18/0.52 395[0:Rew:31.0,239.0] || -> leq(skc2,n0)*l. % 0.18/0.52 396[0:Rew:31.0,240.0] || -> gt(n0,skc2)*r. % 0.18/0.52 400[0:MRR:299.0,395.0] || -> equal(skc2,n0)**. % 0.18/0.52 407[0:Rew:400.0,396.0] || -> gt(n0,n0)*. % 0.18/0.52 415[0:MRR:407.0,29.0] || -> . % 0.18/0.52 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.18/0.52 Formulae used in the proof : cl5_nebula_init_0121 irreflexivity_gt succ_tptp_minus_1 leq_succ leq_succ_gt_equiv finite_domain_0 % 0.18/0.52 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------