%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : lazyCoP---0.1 % Problem : SWV201+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 19:45:51 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 64.68s 8.75s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV201+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % 0.10/0.13 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 14:37:25 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 64.68/8.75 % SZS status Theorem % 64.68/8.75 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c0, axiom, % 64.68/8.75 leq(sK41,n2)). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c1, plain, % 64.68/8.75 leq(sK41,n2), % 64.68/8.75 inference(start, [], [c0])). % 64.68/8.75 % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c2, axiom, % 64.68/8.75 use = a_select3(z_defuse,X0,X1) | ~leq(X1,minus(pv5,n1)) | ~leq(X0,n2) | ~leq(n0,X1) | ~leq(n0,X0)). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a0, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 sK41 = X0). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a1, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 n2 = n2). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c3, plain, % 64.68/8.75 $false, % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c4, plain, % 64.68/8.75 use = a_select3(z_defuse,X0,X1) | ~leq(X1,minus(pv5,n1)) | ~leq(n0,X1) | ~leq(n0,X0), % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])). % 64.68/8.75 % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c5, axiom, % 64.68/8.75 use != a_select3(z_defuse,sK41,sK42)). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a2, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 a_select3(z_defuse,sK41,sK42) = a_select3(z_defuse,X0,X1)). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a3, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 use = X2). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c6, plain, % 64.68/8.75 ~leq(X1,minus(pv5,n1)) | ~leq(n0,X1) | ~leq(n0,X0), % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c7, plain, % 64.68/8.75 $false, % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c8, plain, % 64.68/8.75 use != X2, % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])). % 64.68/8.75 % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a4, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 use = X2). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c9, plain, % 64.68/8.75 $false, % 64.68/8.75 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c8])). % 64.68/8.75 % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c10, axiom, % 64.68/8.75 leq(sK42,minus(pv5,n1))). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a5, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 X1 = sK42). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a6, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 minus(pv5,n1) = minus(pv5,n1)). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c11, plain, % 64.68/8.75 ~leq(n0,X1) | ~leq(n0,X0), % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6])], [c6, c10])). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c12, plain, % 64.68/8.75 $false, % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6])], [c6, c10])). % 64.68/8.75 % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c13, axiom, % 64.68/8.75 leq(n0,sK42)). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a7, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 n0 = n0). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a8, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 X1 = sK42). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c14, plain, % 64.68/8.75 ~leq(n0,X0), % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a7, a8])], [c11, c13])). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c15, plain, % 64.68/8.75 $false, % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a7, a8])], [c11, c13])). % 64.68/8.75 % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c16, axiom, % 64.68/8.75 leq(n0,sK41)). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a9, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 n0 = n0). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(a10, assumption, % 64.68/8.75 X0 = sK41). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c17, plain, % 64.68/8.75 $false, % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a9, a10])], [c14, c16])). % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c18, plain, % 64.68/8.75 $false, % 64.68/8.75 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a9, a10])], [c14, c16])). % 64.68/8.75 % 64.68/8.75 cnf(c19, plain, % 64.68/8.75 $false, % 64.68/8.75 inference(constraint_solving, [ % 64.68/8.75 bind(X0, sK41), % 64.68/8.75 bind(X1, sK42), % 64.68/8.75 bind(X2, use) % 64.68/8.75 ], % 64.68/8.75 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10])). % 64.68/8.75 % 64.68/8.75 % SZS output end IncompleteProof %------------------------------------------------------------------------------