%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SWV210+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:38 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s % Output : Refutation 0.20s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV210+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0. % 0.10/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 14:47:24 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.51 % 0.20/0.51 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.20/0.51 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.20/0.51 % SZS status Theorem % 0.20/0.51 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.20/0.51 SPASS derived 185 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 211 clauses. % 0.20/0.51 SPASS allocated 85852 KBytes. % 0.20/0.51 SPASS spent 0:00:00.15 on the problem. % 0.20/0.51 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 0.20/0.51 0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.20/0.51 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.20/0.51 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.20/0.51 0:00:00.01 for the reduction. % 0.20/0.51 % 0.20/0.51 % 0.20/0.51 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 : % 0.20/0.51 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.20/0.51 2[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc3)*r. % 0.20/0.51 3[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc3,n2)*l. % 0.20/0.51 4[0:Inp] || -> leq(skc2,n998)*l. % 0.20/0.51 5[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,skc2)*r. % 0.20/0.51 93[0:Inp] || equal(a_select3(z_defuse,skc3,skc2),use)** -> . % 0.20/0.51 147[0:Inp] || leq(u,n998) leq(v,n2) leq(n0,u) leq(n0,v) -> equal(a_select3(z_defuse,v,u),use)**. % 0.20/0.51 188[0:Res:147.4,93.0] || leq(n0,skc3) leq(skc3,n2)*l leq(skc2,n998) leq(n0,skc2) -> . % 0.20/0.51 381[0:MRR:188.0,188.1,188.2,188.3,2.0,3.0,4.0,5.0] || -> . % 0.20/0.51 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.20/0.51 Formulae used in the proof : quaternion_ds1_inuse_0021 % 0.20/0.51 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------