%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWV224+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:46:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.40s 2.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 8 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_226,plain,
( n0 != X1
| n4 != X2
| ~ epred3_2(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vqzr4mfs/lgb.p',i_0_226) ).
cnf(i_0_196,plain,
( n4 = X1
| ~ epred3_2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vqzr4mfs/lgb.p',i_0_196) ).
cnf(i_0_199,plain,
( n0 = X1
| ~ epred3_2(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vqzr4mfs/lgb.p',i_0_199) ).
cnf(i_0_126,negated_conjecture,
epred3_2(esk21_0,esk22_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vqzr4mfs/lgb.p',i_0_126) ).
cnf(c_0_231,plain,
( n0 != X1
| n4 != X2
| ~ epred3_2(X2,X1) ),
i_0_226 ).
cnf(c_0_232,plain,
( n4 = X1
| ~ epred3_2(X1,X2) ),
i_0_196 ).
cnf(c_0_233,plain,
( n0 = X1
| ~ epred3_2(X2,X1) ),
i_0_199 ).
cnf(c_0_234,negated_conjecture,
epred3_2(esk21_0,esk22_0),
i_0_126 ).
cnf(c_0_235,plain,
~ epred3_2(X1,X2),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_231,c_0_232]),c_0_233]) ).
cnf(c_0_236,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_234,c_0_235]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWV224+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 02:24:17 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.40/2.30 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.40/2.30 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.40/2.30 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.40/2.30 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.40/2.30 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.40/2.30 #
% 7.40/2.30 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 7.40/2.30 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.40/2.30
% 7.40/2.30 # Proof found!
% 7.40/2.30 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.40/2.30 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.40/2.30 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.40/2.30
% 7.40/2.30 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.40/2.30 # User time : 0.022 s
% 7.40/2.30 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.40/2.30 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.40/2.30 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.40/2.30
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------