↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SWV227+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:44:27 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.91s 1.08s
% Output   : Refutation 0.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem  : SWV227+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May  9 05:17:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.91/1.08  % Version:  1.5
% 0.91/1.08  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.91/1.08  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.91/1.08  fof(quaternion_ds1_symm_0641,conjecture,(((![A]:(![B]:((((leq(n0,A)&leq(n0,B))&leq(A,n5))&leq(B,n5))=>a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))&(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,n2))=>a_select3(r_ds1_filter,C,D)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,D,C)))))=>(![E]:(![F]:((((leq(n0,E)&leq(n0,F))&leq(E,n5))&leq(F,n5))=>((((((((((((((((((((((((((~(n0=E&n3=F))&(~(n0=E&n4=F)))&(~(n0=E&n5=F)))&(~(n0=F&n5=E)))&(~(n1=E&n3=F)))&(~(n1=E&n4=F)))&(~(n1=E&n5=F)))&(~(n1=F&n5=E)))&(~(n2=E&n3=F)))&(~(n2=E&n4=F)))&(~(n2=E&n5=F)))&(~(n2=F&n5=E)))&(~(n3=E&n3=F)))&(~(n3=E&n4=F)))&(~(n3=E&n5=F)))&(~(n3=F&n4=E)))&(~(n3=F&n5=E)))&(~(n4=E&n4=F)))&(~(n4=E&n5=F)))&(~(n4=F&n5=E)))&(~(n5=E&n5=F)))&n2=F)&n4=E)&n4=F)&n5=E)=>a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)=n0))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', quaternion_ds1_symm_0641)).
% 0.91/1.08  fof(c66,negated_conjecture,(~(((![A]:(![B]:((((leq(n0,A)&leq(n0,B))&leq(A,n5))&leq(B,n5))=>a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))&(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,n2))=>a_select3(r_ds1_filter,C,D)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,D,C)))))=>(![E]:(![F]:((((leq(n0,E)&leq(n0,F))&leq(E,n5))&leq(F,n5))=>((((((((((((((((((((((((((~(n0=E&n3=F))&(~(n0=E&n4=F)))&(~(n0=E&n5=F)))&(~(n0=F&n5=E)))&(~(n1=E&n3=F)))&(~(n1=E&n4=F)))&(~(n1=E&n5=F)))&(~(n1=F&n5=E)))&(~(n2=E&n3=F)))&(~(n2=E&n4=F)))&(~(n2=E&n5=F)))&(~(n2=F&n5=E)))&(~(n3=E&n3=F)))&(~(n3=E&n4=F)))&(~(n3=E&n5=F)))&(~(n3=F&n4=E)))&(~(n3=F&n5=E)))&(~(n4=E&n4=F)))&(~(n4=E&n5=F)))&(~(n4=F&n5=E)))&(~(n5=E&n5=F)))&n2=F)&n4=E)&n4=F)&n5=E)=>a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)=n0)))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[quaternion_ds1_symm_0641])).
% 0.91/1.08  fof(c67,negated_conjecture,(((![A]:(![B]:((((~leq(n0,A)|~leq(n0,B))|~leq(A,n5))|~leq(B,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))&(![C]:(![D]:((((~leq(n0,C)|~leq(n0,D))|~leq(C,n2))|~leq(D,n2))|a_select3(r_ds1_filter,C,D)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,D,C)))))&(?[E]:(?[F]:((((leq(n0,E)&leq(n0,F))&leq(E,n5))&leq(F,n5))&((((((((((((((((((((((((((n0!=E|n3!=F)&(n0!=E|n4!=F))&(n0!=E|n5!=F))&(n0!=F|n5!=E))&(n1!=E|n3!=F))&(n1!=E|n4!=F))&(n1!=E|n5!=F))&(n1!=F|n5!=E))&(n2!=E|n3!=F))&(n2!=E|n4!=F))&(n2!=E|n5!=F))&(n2!=F|n5!=E))&(n3!=E|n3!=F))&(n3!=E|n4!=F))&(n3!=E|n5!=F))&(n3!=F|n4!=E))&(n3!=F|n5!=E))&(n4!=E|n4!=F))&(n4!=E|n5!=F))&(n4!=F|n5!=E))&(n5!=E|n5!=F))&n2=F)&n4=E)&n4=F)&n5=E)&a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)!=n0))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c66])).
% 0.91/1.08  fof(c68,negated_conjecture,(((![X8]:(![X9]:((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))))&(![X10]:(![X11]:((((~leq(n0,X10)|~leq(n0,X11))|~leq(X10,n2))|~leq(X11,n2))|a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X10,X11)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X11,X10)))))&(?[X12]:(?[X13]:((((leq(n0,X12)&leq(n0,X13))&leq(X12,n5))&leq(X13,n5))&((((((((((((((((((((((((((n0!=X12|n3!=X13)&(n0!=X12|n4!=X13))&(n0!=X12|n5!=X13))&(n0!=X13|n5!=X12))&(n1!=X12|n3!=X13))&(n1!=X12|n4!=X13))&(n1!=X12|n5!=X13))&(n1!=X13|n5!=X12))&(n2!=X12|n3!=X13))&(n2!=X12|n4!=X13))&(n2!=X12|n5!=X13))&(n2!=X13|n5!=X12))&(n3!=X12|n3!=X13))&(n3!=X12|n4!=X13))&(n3!=X12|n5!=X13))&(n3!=X13|n4!=X12))&(n3!=X13|n5!=X12))&(n4!=X12|n4!=X13))&(n4!=X12|n5!=X13))&(n4!=X13|n5!=X12))&(n5!=X12|n5!=X13))&n2=X13)&n4=X12)&n4=X13)&n5=X12)&a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)!=n0))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c67])).
% 0.91/1.08  fof(c70,negated_conjecture,(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:(![X11]:((((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))&((((~leq(n0,X10)|~leq(n0,X11))|~leq(X10,n2))|~leq(X11,n2))|a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X10,X11)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X11,X10)))&((((leq(n0,skolem0001)&leq(n0,skolem0002))&leq(skolem0001,n5))&leq(skolem0002,n5))&((((((((((((((((((((((((((n0!=skolem0001|n3!=skolem0002)&(n0!=skolem0001|n4!=skolem0002))&(n0!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n0!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n1!=skolem0001|n3!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0001|n4!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n2!=skolem0001|n3!=skolem0002))&(n2!=skolem0001|n4!=skolem0002))&(n2!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n2!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n3!=skolem0001|n3!=skolem0002))&(n3!=skolem0001|n4!=skolem0002))&(n3!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n3!=skolem0002|n4!=skolem0001))&(n3!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n4!=skolem0001|n4!=skolem0002))&(n4!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n4!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n5!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&n2=skolem0002)&n4=skolem0001)&n4=skolem0002)&n5=skolem0001)&a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)!=n0))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c69,negated_conjecture,(((![X8]:(![X9]:((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))))&(![X10]:(![X11]:((((~leq(n0,X10)|~leq(n0,X11))|~leq(X10,n2))|~leq(X11,n2))|a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X10,X11)=a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X11,X10)))))&((((leq(n0,skolem0001)&leq(n0,skolem0002))&leq(skolem0001,n5))&leq(skolem0002,n5))&((((((((((((((((((((((((((n0!=skolem0001|n3!=skolem0002)&(n0!=skolem0001|n4!=skolem0002))&(n0!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n0!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n1!=skolem0001|n3!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0001|n4!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n2!=skolem0001|n3!=skolem0002))&(n2!=skolem0001|n4!=skolem0002))&(n2!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n2!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n3!=skolem0001|n3!=skolem0002))&(n3!=skolem0001|n4!=skolem0002))&(n3!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n3!=skolem0002|n4!=skolem0001))&(n3!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n4!=skolem0001|n4!=skolem0002))&(n4!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&(n4!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001))&(n5!=skolem0001|n5!=skolem0002))&n2=skolem0002)&n4=skolem0001)&n4=skolem0002)&n5=skolem0001)&a_select2(xinit_noise,n4)!=n0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c68])).])).
% 0.91/1.08  cnf(c98,negated_conjecture,n2=skolem0002,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c70])).
% 0.91/1.08  cnf(c101,negated_conjecture,n5=skolem0001,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c70])).
% 0.91/1.08  cnf(c88,negated_conjecture,n2!=skolem0002|n5!=skolem0001,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c70])).
% 0.91/1.08  cnf(c1395,plain,n2!=skolem0002,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c88, c101])).
% 0.91/1.08  cnf(c1396,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1395, c98])).
% 0.91/1.08  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.91/1.08  
% 0.91/1.08  % Initial clauses    : 344
% 0.91/1.08  % Processed clauses  : 217
% 0.91/1.08  % Factors computed   : 26
% 0.91/1.08  % Resolvents computed: 882
% 0.91/1.08  % Tautologies deleted: 2
% 0.91/1.08  % Forward subsumed   : 70
% 0.91/1.08  % Backward subsumed  : 9
% 0.91/1.08  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.91/1.08  % User time          : 0.689 s
% 0.91/1.08  % System time        : 0.022 s
% 0.91/1.08  % Total time         : 0.711 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------