↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SWV232+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:44:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.59s 0.81s
% Output   : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem  : SWV232+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.06/0.26  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % DateTime : Thu May  9 06:32:22 EDT 2024
% 0.06/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.59/0.81  % Version:  1.5
% 0.59/0.81  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.59/0.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.59/0.81  fof(quaternion_ds1_symm_0841,conjecture,((![A]:(![B]:((((leq(n0,A)&leq(n0,B))&leq(A,n5))&leq(B,n5))=>a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))=>(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,n2))=>((((((((((((~(n0=C&n1=D))&(~(n0=C&n2=D)))&(~(n0=D&n2=C)))&(~(n1=C&n1=D)))&(~(n1=C&n2=D)))&(~(n1=D&n2=C)))&(~(n2=C&n2=D)))&n0=D)&n1=C)&n1=D)&n2=C)=>a_select2(rho,n1)=n0))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', quaternion_ds1_symm_0841)).
% 0.59/0.81  fof(c66,negated_conjecture,(~((![A]:(![B]:((((leq(n0,A)&leq(n0,B))&leq(A,n5))&leq(B,n5))=>a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))=>(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,n2))=>((((((((((((~(n0=C&n1=D))&(~(n0=C&n2=D)))&(~(n0=D&n2=C)))&(~(n1=C&n1=D)))&(~(n1=C&n2=D)))&(~(n1=D&n2=C)))&(~(n2=C&n2=D)))&n0=D)&n1=C)&n1=D)&n2=C)=>a_select2(rho,n1)=n0)))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[quaternion_ds1_symm_0841])).
% 0.59/0.81  fof(c67,negated_conjecture,((![A]:(![B]:((((~leq(n0,A)|~leq(n0,B))|~leq(A,n5))|~leq(B,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,A,B)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,B,A))))&(?[C]:(?[D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n2))&leq(D,n2))&((((((((((((n0!=C|n1!=D)&(n0!=C|n2!=D))&(n0!=D|n2!=C))&(n1!=C|n1!=D))&(n1!=C|n2!=D))&(n1!=D|n2!=C))&(n2!=C|n2!=D))&n0=D)&n1=C)&n1=D)&n2=C)&a_select2(rho,n1)!=n0))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c66])).
% 0.59/0.81  fof(c68,negated_conjecture,((![X8]:(![X9]:((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))))&(?[X10]:(?[X11]:((((leq(n0,X10)&leq(n0,X11))&leq(X10,n2))&leq(X11,n2))&((((((((((((n0!=X10|n1!=X11)&(n0!=X10|n2!=X11))&(n0!=X11|n2!=X10))&(n1!=X10|n1!=X11))&(n1!=X10|n2!=X11))&(n1!=X11|n2!=X10))&(n2!=X10|n2!=X11))&n0=X11)&n1=X10)&n1=X11)&n2=X10)&a_select2(rho,n1)!=n0))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c67])).
% 0.59/0.81  fof(c70,negated_conjecture,(![X8]:(![X9]:(((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))&((((leq(n0,skolem0001)&leq(n0,skolem0002))&leq(skolem0001,n2))&leq(skolem0002,n2))&((((((((((((n0!=skolem0001|n1!=skolem0002)&(n0!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&(n0!=skolem0002|n2!=skolem0001))&(n1!=skolem0001|n1!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0002|n2!=skolem0001))&(n2!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&n0=skolem0002)&n1=skolem0001)&n1=skolem0002)&n2=skolem0001)&a_select2(rho,n1)!=n0))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c69,negated_conjecture,((![X8]:(![X9]:((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,n5))|~leq(X9,n5))|a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X8,X9)=a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X9,X8))))&((((leq(n0,skolem0001)&leq(n0,skolem0002))&leq(skolem0001,n2))&leq(skolem0002,n2))&((((((((((((n0!=skolem0001|n1!=skolem0002)&(n0!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&(n0!=skolem0002|n2!=skolem0001))&(n1!=skolem0001|n1!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&(n1!=skolem0002|n2!=skolem0001))&(n2!=skolem0001|n2!=skolem0002))&n0=skolem0002)&n1=skolem0001)&n1=skolem0002)&n2=skolem0001)&a_select2(rho,n1)!=n0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c68])).])).
% 0.59/0.81  cnf(c83,negated_conjecture,n0=skolem0002,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c70])).
% 0.59/0.81  cnf(c86,negated_conjecture,n2=skolem0001,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c70])).
% 0.59/0.81  cnf(c78,negated_conjecture,n0!=skolem0002|n2!=skolem0001,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c70])).
% 0.59/0.81  cnf(c1175,plain,n0!=skolem0002,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c78, c86])).
% 0.59/0.81  cnf(c1176,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1175, c83])).
% 0.59/0.81  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.59/0.81  
% 0.59/0.81  % Initial clauses    : 329
% 0.59/0.81  % Processed clauses  : 164
% 0.59/0.81  % Factors computed   : 24
% 0.59/0.81  % Resolvents computed: 679
% 0.59/0.81  % Tautologies deleted: 2
% 0.59/0.81  % Forward subsumed   : 64
% 0.59/0.81  % Backward subsumed  : 2
% 0.59/0.81  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.59/0.81  % User time          : 0.529 s
% 0.59/0.81  % System time        : 0.015 s
% 0.59/0.81  % Total time         : 0.544 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------