↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : SWV237+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 09:29:50 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.69s 2.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  22 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  25   ~;  19   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (  38   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ p > enc > #nlpp > i > zcmk > wk > w > tmk > tc > t2 > t1 > pp > lp > kk > k > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(zcmk,type,
    zcmk: $i ).

tff(enc,type,
    enc: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(i,type,
    i: $i > $i ).

tff(pp,type,
    pp: $i ).

tff(w,type,
    w: $i ).

tff(k,type,
    k: $i ).

tff(p,type,
    p: $i > $o ).

tff(tmk,type,
    tmk: $i ).

tff(t2,type,
    t2: $i ).

tff(tc,type,
    tc: $i ).

tff(kk,type,
    kk: $i ).

tff(wk,type,
    wk: $i ).

tff(t1,type,
    t1: $i ).

tff(lp,type,
    lp: $i ).

tff(f_144,axiom,
    p(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intruder_knows_8) ).

tff(f_86,axiom,
    ! [U,V,W] :
      ( ( p(U)
        & p(V)
        & p(W) )
     => p(enc(tc,U)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',encrypt_clear_key_as_Tcomms_key) ).

tff(f_141,axiom,
    p(enc(tc,k)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intruder_knows_5) ).

tff(f_137,axiom,
    p(enc(tmk,pp)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intruder_knows_1) ).

tff(f_29,axiom,
    ! [U,V] : ( enc(i(U),enc(U,V)) = V ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',enc_dec_cancel) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [U] : ( i(i(U)) = U ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',double_inverse_cancel) ).

tff(f_31,axiom,
    ! [U,V] : ( enc(U,enc(i(U),V)) = V ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dec_enc_cancel) ).

tff(f_77,axiom,
    ! [U,V,W] :
      ( ( p(U)
        & p(V)
        & p(W) )
     => p(enc(enc(i(tmk),V),enc(i(tc),U))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',encrypt_a_stored_comms_key) ).

tff(f_147,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(enc(pp,a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    p(a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [U_22,W_24,V_23] :
      ( p(enc(tc,U_22))
      | ~ p(W_24)
      | ~ p(V_23)
      | ~ p(U_22) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_86]) ).

tff(c_137,plain,
    ! [W_24] : ~ p(W_24),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_20]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    p(enc(tc,k)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_141]) ).

tff(c_148,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_42]) ).

tff(c_149,plain,
    ! [V_23,U_22] :
      ( ~ p(V_23)
      | p(enc(tc,U_22))
      | ~ p(U_22) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_20]) ).

tff(c_150,plain,
    ! [V_23] : ~ p(V_23),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_149]) ).

tff(c_161,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_150,c_42]) ).

tff(c_162,plain,
    ! [U_22] :
      ( p(enc(tc,U_22))
      | ~ p(U_22) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_149]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    p(enc(tmk,pp)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_137]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [U_1,V_2] : ( enc(i(U_1),enc(U_1,V_2)) = V_2 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [U_5] : ( i(i(U_5)) = U_5 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [U_3,V_4] : ( enc(U_3,enc(i(U_3),V_4)) = V_4 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_31]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [V_20,U_19,W_21] :
      ( p(enc(enc(i(tmk),V_20),enc(i(tc),U_19)))
      | ~ p(W_21)
      | ~ p(V_20)
      | ~ p(U_19) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_77]) ).

tff(c_702,plain,
    ! [W_21] : ~ p(W_21),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_18]) ).

tff(c_730,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_702,c_42]) ).

tff(c_855,plain,
    ! [V_83,U_84] :
      ( p(enc(enc(i(tmk),V_83),enc(i(tc),U_84)))
      | ~ p(V_83)
      | ~ p(U_84) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_18]) ).

tff(c_864,plain,
    ! [V_4,U_84] :
      ( p(enc(V_4,enc(i(tc),U_84)))
      | ~ p(enc(i(i(tmk)),V_4))
      | ~ p(U_84) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_855]) ).

tff(c_1408,plain,
    ! [V_102,U_103] :
      ( p(enc(V_102,enc(i(tc),U_103)))
      | ~ p(enc(tmk,V_102))
      | ~ p(U_103) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_864]) ).

tff(c_1526,plain,
    ! [V_107,V_108] :
      ( p(enc(V_107,V_108))
      | ~ p(enc(tmk,V_107))
      | ~ p(enc(tc,V_108)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_1408]) ).

tff(c_1548,plain,
    ! [V_109] :
      ( p(enc(pp,V_109))
      | ~ p(enc(tc,V_109)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_1526]) ).

tff(c_1590,plain,
    ! [U_110] :
      ( p(enc(pp,U_110))
      | ~ p(U_110) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_162,c_1548]) ).

tff(c_50,plain,
    ~ p(enc(pp,a)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_147]) ).

tff(c_1603,plain,
    ~ p(a),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1590,c_50]) ).

tff(c_1615,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_48,c_1603]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : SWV237+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Wed Apr  9 02:52:33 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.69/2.07  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.69/2.08  
% 4.69/2.08  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------