↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SWV237+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:19:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SWV237+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 01:18:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.13/0.37  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.13/0.37  #
% 0.13/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37  # Number of axioms: 25 Number of unprocessed: 25
% 0.13/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.37  # 25 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.37  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.37  # Found 12 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.37  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.37  # 13 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.37  # 12 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.13/0.37  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.13/0.37  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.13/0.37  # Returning from population with 63 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.37  # We now have 63 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.41  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.41  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.41  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.41  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.41  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (p(a))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (p(kk))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (p(enc(tmk,pp)))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (p(i(kk)))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (i(i(X1))=X1)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (p(enc(wk,w)))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (p(enc(tc,k)))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (p(enc(lp,t2)))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (p(enc(w,t1)))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (enc(i(X1),enc(X1,X2))=X2)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (enc(X1,enc(i(X1),X2))=X2)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (~p(enc(pp,a)))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (p(i(X1))|~p(X1))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (p(enc(X1,X2))|~p(X3)|~p(X2)|~p(X1))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (p(enc(tc,X1))|~p(X2)|~p(X3)|~p(X1))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(tc),X1),X2))|~p(X3)|~p(X2)|~p(X1))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (p(enc(wk,enc(i(tmk),X1)))|~p(X2)|~p(X3)|~p(X1))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (p(enc(i(enc(i(tc),X1)),X2))|~p(X3)|~p(X2)|~p(X1))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(tmk),X1),enc(i(tmk),X2)))|~p(X3)|~p(X1)|~p(X2))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(tmk),X1),enc(i(tc),X2)))|~p(X3)|~p(X1)|~p(X2))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(wk),X1),enc(i(lp),X2)))|~p(X3)|~p(X1)|~p(X2))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (p(enc(tmk,enc(i(enc(i(zcmk),X1)),X2)))|~p(X3)|~p(X1)|~p(X2))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (p(enc(i(enc(i(zcmk),X1)),enc(i(tmk),X2)))|~p(X3)|~p(X1)|~p(X2))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(wk),X1),enc(i(enc(i(tmk),X2)),X3)))|~p(X1)|~p(X2)|~p(X3))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(wk),X1),enc(i(enc(i(wk),X2)),X3)))|~p(X1)|~p(X2)|~p(X3))).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_127, plain, (X46=X46)).
% 0.19/0.41  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.41  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.41  # Found 6 steps
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (p(a)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_134, plain, (p(a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_236, plain, (~p(a)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_237, plain, (~p(a)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_235, plain, (p(enc(i(enc(i(zcmk),a)),enc(i(tmk),a)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.19/0.41  cnf(i_0_262, plain, (p(i(enc(i(enc(i(zcmk),a)),enc(i(tmk),a))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_262, ...])).
% 0.19/0.41  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.41  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.41  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.41  # Child (24670) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.41  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------