↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV237+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:07:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 18.85s 2.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 18.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  14   ~;  12   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   4 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(enc_dec_cancel,axiom,
    ! [U,V] : enc(i(U),enc(U,V)) = V,
    file('theBenchmark.p',enc_dec_cancel) ).

fof(encrypt_a_stored_comms_key,axiom,
    ! [U,V,W] :
      ( ( p(W)
        & p(V)
        & p(U) )
     => p(enc(enc(i(tmk),V),enc(i(tc),U))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',encrypt_a_stored_comms_key) ).

fof(encrypt_clear_key_as_Tcomms_key,axiom,
    ! [U,V,W] :
      ( ( p(W)
        & p(V)
        & p(U) )
     => p(enc(tc,U)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',encrypt_clear_key_as_Tcomms_key) ).

fof(co1,conjecture,
    p(enc(pp,a)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(co1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(enc(pp,a)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    enc(i(A),enc(A,B)) = B,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[enc_dec_cancel]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    ( p(enc(enc(i(tmk),B),enc(i(tc),A)))
    | ~ p(C)
    | ~ p(B)
    | ~ p(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[encrypt_a_stored_comms_key]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    ( p(enc(tc,A))
    | ~ p(C)
    | ~ p(B)
    | ~ p(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[encrypt_clear_key_as_Tcomms_key]) ).

fof(intruder_knows_1,axiom,
    p(enc(tmk,pp)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',intruder_knows_1) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    p(enc(tmk,pp)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[intruder_knows_1]) ).

fof(intruder_knows_8,axiom,
    p(a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',intruder_knows_8) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    p(a),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[intruder_knows_8]) ).

cnf(c_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(enc(pp,a)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    ( p(enc(enc(i(tmk),B),enc(i(tc),A)))
    | ~ p(B)
    | ~ p(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_26]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    ( p(enc(tc,A))
    | ~ p(B)
    | ~ p(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_27]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    ( p(enc(tc,A))
    | ~ p(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_1564,plain,
    p(enc(tc,a)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_18220,plain,
    ( p(enc(enc(i(tmk),A),enc(i(tc),enc(tc,a))))
    | ~ p(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_1564]) ).

cnf(c_18221,plain,
    p(enc(enc(i(tmk),enc(tmk,pp)),enc(i(tc),enc(tc,a)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18220,c_34]) ).

cnf(c_18222,plain,
    p(enc(pp,enc(i(tc),enc(tc,a)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_18221]) ).

cnf(c_18223,plain,
    p(enc(pp,a)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_18222]) ).

cnf(c_18219,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_18223]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SWV237+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.31  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:20:51 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.31  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.03/0.31  % Process 702814 was started by sandbox2 on n012,
% 0.03/0.31  % Sat Sep 26 13:20:51 2026
% 0.03/0.31  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.03/0.32  
% 0.03/0.32  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 18.85/2.75  
% 18.85/2.75  % Assigning unary symbol i kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (16).
% 18.85/2.75  
% 18.85/2.75  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 18.85/2.75  
% 18.85/2.75  % Proof 1 at 1.73 (+ 0.49) seconds.
% 18.85/2.75  % Length of proof is 15.
% 18.85/2.75  % Level of proof is 5.
% 18.85/2.75  % Maximum clause weight is 40.000.
% 18.85/2.75  % Given clauses 54.
% 18.85/2.75  
% 18.85/2.75  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------