%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV239-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:53 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 1.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__cong_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X3),c_Message_Oanalz(X4),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__cong_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__analzD__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__analzD__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X3),c_Message_Oanalz(X4),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__cong_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X3),c_Message_Oanalz(X4),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__analzD__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV239-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.54 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.54 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.54 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.54 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.54 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.54 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.54 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.54 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:36:09 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.54 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.54 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/1.00 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/1.00 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/1.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 600141 completed with status 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/1.00 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/1.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/1.00 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/1.00 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/1.00 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with pid 600151 completed with status 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Result found by G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I
% 0.15/1.00 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/1.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/1.00 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/1.00 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/1.00 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/1.00 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/1.00 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/1.00
% 0.15/1.00 % Proof found!
% 0.15/1.00 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/1.00 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/1.00 % Parsed axioms : 1400
% 0.15/1.00 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Initial clauses : 1400
% 0.15/1.00 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.15/1.00 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1399
% 0.15/1.00 % Processed clauses : 3004
% 0.15/1.00 % ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.15/1.00 % ...subsumed : 352
% 0.15/1.00 % ...remaining for further processing : 2644
% 0.15/1.00 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.15/1.00 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.15/1.00 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.15/1.00 % Generated clauses : 3665
% 0.15/1.00 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2850
% 0.15/1.00 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.15/1.00 % Paramodulations : 3624
% 0.15/1.00 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Equation resolutions : 41
% 0.15/1.00 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Total rewrite steps : 833
% 0.15/1.00 % ...of those cached : 731
% 0.15/1.00 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/1.00 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/1.00 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/1.00 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/1.00 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/1.00 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/1.00 % Current number of processed clauses : 1277
% 0.15/1.00 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 177
% 0.15/1.00 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Negative unit clauses : 48
% 0.15/1.00 % Non-unit-clauses : 1052
% 0.15/1.00 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2604
% 0.15/1.00 % ...number of literals in the above : 5276
% 0.15/1.00 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Current number of archived clauses : 1367
% 0.15/1.00 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 987344
% 0.15/1.00 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 964422
% 0.15/1.00 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 326
% 0.15/1.00 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13193
% 0.15/1.00 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % BW rewrite match attempts : 62
% 0.15/1.00 % BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.15/1.00 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/1.00 % Termbank termtop insertions : 62116
% 0.15/1.00 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1692
% 0.15/1.00
% 0.15/1.00 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/1.00 % User time : 0.333 s
% 0.15/1.00 % System time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/1.00 % Total time : 0.351 s
% 0.15/1.00 % Maximum resident set size: 5864 pages
% 0.15/1.00
% 0.15/1.00 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/1.00 % User time : 1.718 s
% 0.15/1.00 % System time : 0.074 s
% 0.15/1.00 % Total time : 1.792 s
% 0.15/1.00 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.15/1.00 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------