%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : SWV239-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 06:32:08 EST 2010 % Result : Timeout 300.06s % Output : None % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14263/SWV/SWV239-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ...... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 17] [nf = 0] [nu = 12] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 63] [nf = 1] [nu = 42] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 172] [nf = 4] [nu = 109] [ut = 12] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 412] [nf = 13] [nu = 253] [ut = 13] % Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 919] [nf = 36] [nu = 554] [ut = 14] % Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 1965] [nf = 89] [nu = 1172] [ut = 15] % Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 4094] [nf = 204] [nu = 2427] [ut = 16] % Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 8394] [nf = 445] [nu = 4959] [ut = 17] % Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 17041] [nf = 940] [nu = 10048] [ut = 18] % Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 34387] [nf = 1945] [nu = 20254] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 69136] [nf = 3972] [nu = 40697] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 138696] [nf = 8045] [nu = 81617] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 277883] [nf = 16212] [nu = 163494] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 556329] [nf = 32569] [nu = 327288] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ... % t = 3 secs [nr = 1113298] [nf = 65308] [nu = 654919] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ... % t = 6 secs [nr = 2227318] [nf = 130813] [nu = 1310227] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ... % t = 12 secs [nr = 4455445] [nf = 261852] [nu = 2620892] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ... % t = 24 secs [nr = 8911791] [nf = 523961] [nu = 5242274] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ... % t = 48 secs [nr = 17824580] [nf = 1048212] [nu = 10485093] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ... % t = 97 secs [nr = 35650260] [nf = 2096749] [nu = 20970789] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ... % Entering time slice 2 % Updating parameters ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44822818] [nf = 2636483] [nu = 26366413] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44822864] [nf = 2636484] [nu = 26366443] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44822973] [nf = 2636487] [nu = 26366510] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44823213] [nf = 2636496] [nu = 26366654] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44823720] [nf = 2636519] [nu = 26366955] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44824766] [nf = 2636572] [nu = 26367573] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44826895] [nf = 2636687] [nu = 26368828] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44831195] [nf = 2636928] [nu = 26371360] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44839842] [nf = 2637423] [nu = 26376449] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44857188] [nf = 2638428] [nu = 26386655] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 44891937] [nf = 2640455] [nu = 26407098] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ... % t = 123 secs [nr = 44961497] [nf = 2644528] [nu = 26448018] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ... % t = 123 secs [nr = 45100684] [nf = 2652695] [nu = 26529895] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ... % t = 124 secs [nr = 45379130] [nf = 2669052] [nu = 26693689] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ... % t = 125 secs [nr = 45936099] [nf = 2701791] [nu = 27021320] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ... % t = 128 secs [nr = 47050119] [nf = 2767296] [nu = 27676628] [u % t = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ... % t = 134 secs [nr = 49278246] [nf = 2898335] [nu = 28987293] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ... % t = 146 secs [nr = 53734592] [nf = 3160444] [nu = 31608675] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ... % t = 170 secs [nr = 62647381] [nf = 3684695] [nu = 36851494] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ... % t = 219 secs [nr = 80473061] [nf = 4733232] [nu = 47337190] [ut = 19] % Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ... % TIME IS UP! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 117541292 % resolvents: 111011565 factors: 6529727 % Number of unit clauses generated: 65301018 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 55.56 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 2 [1] = 9 [3] = 1 % [4] = 1 [5] = 1 [6] = 1 [7] = 1 % [8] = 1 [9] = 1 [10] = 1 % Total = 19 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 65301018 [2] = 52240274 % Average size of a generated clause: 2.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] c_in_3 (+)1 (-)8 % [1] c_lessequals_3 (+)9 (-)1 % ------------------ % Total: (+)10 (-)9 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 19 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 0 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 117541292 % Number of unification failures: 84889072 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 17 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 208957750 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 26119521 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 45 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 32650793 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 32647804 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 26 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 10 % Number of states in UCFA table: 135 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 301 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.45 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 43 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 202430364 % ConstructUnitClause() = 32650810 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 61.01 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: 391804 % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 303 secs % CPU time: 300.00 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------