↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV240-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 43.76s 17.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 43.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  15 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  24   ~;  23   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   7 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   0 sgn  43   !;   0   ?;  29   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f127,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

fof(f128,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

fof(f131,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,tc_set(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).

fof(f1452,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).

fof(f1473,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X0,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__cong_0) ).

fof(f1475,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

tcf(c_1555,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).

tcf(c_1556,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f128]) ).

tcf(c_1558,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,tc_set(X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f131]) ).

tcf(c_2059,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1452]) ).

tcf(c_2080,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X0,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1473]) ).

tcf(c_2082,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1475]) ).

tcf(c_14406,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14407,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14408,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14409,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_union(iPr_def_12,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14410,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14411,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14412,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2082,c_14411,c_14408,c_14409,c_14410,c_14406,c_14407]) ).

tcf(c_20385,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,iPr_def_15),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14411,c_1558]) ).

tcf(c_21196,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2059,c_1556]) ).

tcf(c_21234,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_21196,c_14411]) ).

tcf(c_27929,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X0,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),iPr_def_15) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2080,c_14411]) ).

tcf(c_27944,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_13),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_15) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14409,c_27929]) ).

tcf(c_27946,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_15) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_27944,c_14410]) ).

tcf(c_32202,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),iPr_def_15)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_15) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14406,c_27946]) ).

tcf(c_32207,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15)
    | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_15)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),iPr_def_15) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_32202,c_14407,c_14408]) ).

tcf(c_32208,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_15),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_32207,c_14412,c_20385]) ).

tcf(c_98885,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),iPr_def_15)
      | c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1555,c_21234]) ).

tcf(c_99134,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),iPr_def_15),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_98885,c_14411]) ).

tcf(c_99526,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_32208,c_99134]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV240-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/10.61  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/10.61  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/10.61  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/10.61  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/10.61  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/10.61  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/10.61  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/10.61  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:45:28 UTC 2026
% 0.13/10.61  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/10.61  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/10.65  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/10.65  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/10.67  
% 0.13/10.67  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/10.67  
% 0.13/10.67  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/10.68  % Proving...
% 43.76/17.15  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 43.76/17.15  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % ------  iProver source info
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 43.76/17.15  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 43.76/17.15  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 18 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 30 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ Proving...
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % 
% 43.76/17.15  % clauses                               341
% 43.76/17.15  % conjectures                           1
% 43.76/17.15  % EPR                                   28
% 43.76/17.15  % Horn                                  308
% 43.76/17.15  % unary                                 88
% 43.76/17.15  % binary                                196
% 43.76/17.15  % lits                                  651
% 43.76/17.15  % lits eq                               191
% 43.76/17.15  % fd_pure                               0
% 43.76/17.15  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 43.76/17.15  % fd_cond                               21
% 43.76/17.15  % fd_pseudo_cond                        50
% 43.76/17.15  % AC symbols                            0
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ 
% 43.76/17.15  % Current options:
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ 
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % 
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % ------ Proving...
% 43.76/17.15  % 
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 43.76/17.15  
% 43.76/17.15  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------