%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : SWV240-2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 05:21:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.23s 1.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__cong_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X3),c_Message_Oanalz(X4),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__cong_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3) ),
cls_Set_OsubsetI_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X3),c_Message_Oanalz(X4),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__cong_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWV240-2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.32 % DateTime : Tue May 5 04:59:11 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.33 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.23/1.71 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.23/1.71 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.71 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.71 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.23/1.71 % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------