↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV240-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.28s 16.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  15 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  24   ~;  23   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   7 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   0 sgn  43   !;   0   ?;  29   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X0,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__cong_0) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,tc_set(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).

tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X0,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,tc_set(X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_86,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_87,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_88,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_89,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_union(iPr_def_12,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_90,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_91,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_91,c_88,c_89,c_90,c_86,c_87]) ).

tcf(c_264,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,iPr_def_15),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_288,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_290,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_288,c_91]) ).

tcf(c_294,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X0,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X3,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),iPr_def_15) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_91]) ).

tcf(c_307,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_13),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_15) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_294]) ).

tcf(c_308,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),iPr_def_15)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_15) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_307,c_90]) ).

tcf(c_378,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),iPr_def_15)
      | c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_290]) ).

tcf(c_385,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),iPr_def_15),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_378,c_91]) ).

tcf(c_412,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),iPr_def_15)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_15) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_308]) ).

tcf(c_415,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15)
    | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_15)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),iPr_def_15) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_412,c_87,c_88]) ).

tcf(c_416,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_15),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_415,c_92,c_264]) ).

tcf(c_423,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_416,c_385]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV240-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/15.37  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/15.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/15.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/15.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/15.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/15.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/15.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/15.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:52:57 UTC 2026
% 0.09/15.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/15.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/15.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/15.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/15.42  
% 0.14/15.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/15.42  
% 0.14/15.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/15.43  % Proving...
% 0.28/16.07  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/16.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.28/16.07  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.28/16.07  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ Proving...
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % 
% 0.28/16.07  % clauses                               12
% 0.28/16.07  % conjectures                           1
% 0.28/16.07  % EPR                                   1
% 0.28/16.07  % Horn                                  11
% 0.28/16.07  % unary                                 8
% 0.28/16.07  % binary                                3
% 0.28/16.07  % lits                                  17
% 0.28/16.07  % lits eq                               6
% 0.28/16.07  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.28/16.07  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.28/16.07  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.28/16.07  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 0.28/16.07  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ 
% 0.28/16.07  % Current options:
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ 
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % 
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % ------ Proving...
% 0.28/16.07  % 
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/16.07  
% 0.28/16.07  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.28/16.07  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------