%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV241-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.68s 1.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 10 unt; 10 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 61 ( 7 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__trans_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__trans_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OinsertE_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| X1 = X2
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OinsertE_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__trans_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| X1 = X2
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OinsertE_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
| c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| X1 = X2
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) = v_X ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) = v_X ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) = v_X ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) = v_X,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_15]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_15]),c_0_23]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV241-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:35:18 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.68/1.49 % Version: 3.5.1
% 7.68/1.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 7.68/1.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3038114 completed with status 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.68/1.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 7.68/1.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 7.68/1.49 % No SInE strategy applied
% 7.68/1.49 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 7.68/1.49 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3038123 completed with status 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.68/1.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 7.68/1.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 7.68/1.49 % No SInE strategy applied
% 7.68/1.49 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 7.68/1.49 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 7.68/1.49 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 7.68/1.49 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.68/1.49
% 7.68/1.49 % Proof found!
% 7.68/1.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.68/1.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.68/1.49 % Parsed axioms : 1389
% 7.68/1.49 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Initial clauses : 1389
% 7.68/1.49 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 7.68/1.49 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1388
% 7.68/1.49 % Processed clauses : 11605
% 7.68/1.49 % ...of these trivial : 1334
% 7.68/1.49 % ...subsumed : 5891
% 7.68/1.49 % ...remaining for further processing : 4380
% 7.68/1.49 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 43
% 7.68/1.49 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Backward-subsumed : 31
% 7.68/1.49 % Backward-rewritten : 350
% 7.68/1.49 % Generated clauses : 75297
% 7.68/1.49 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 68851
% 7.68/1.49 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 11
% 7.68/1.49 % Paramodulations : 75204
% 7.68/1.49 % Factorizations : 10
% 7.68/1.49 % NegExts : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Equation resolutions : 83
% 7.68/1.49 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Total rewrite steps : 48838
% 7.68/1.49 % ...of those cached : 46457
% 7.68/1.49 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Propositional check models : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 7.68/1.49 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 7.68/1.49 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 7.68/1.49 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 7.68/1.49 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 7.68/1.49 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 7.68/1.49 % Current number of processed clauses : 2650
% 7.68/1.49 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 365
% 7.68/1.49 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Negative unit clauses : 171
% 7.68/1.49 % Non-unit-clauses : 2114
% 7.68/1.49 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 58156
% 7.68/1.49 % ...number of literals in the above : 105027
% 7.68/1.49 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Current number of archived clauses : 1730
% 7.68/1.49 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2784713
% 7.68/1.49 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2629951
% 7.68/1.49 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4206
% 7.68/1.49 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28977
% 7.68/1.49 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3069
% 7.68/1.49 % BW rewrite match successes : 239
% 7.68/1.49 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Condensation successes : 0
% 7.68/1.49 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1383389
% 7.68/1.49 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1664
% 7.68/1.49
% 7.68/1.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.68/1.49 % User time : 0.969 s
% 7.68/1.49 % System time : 0.049 s
% 7.68/1.49 % Total time : 1.018 s
% 7.68/1.49 % Maximum resident set size: 5648 pages
% 7.68/1.49
% 7.68/1.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.68/1.49 % User time : 4.755 s
% 7.68/1.49 % System time : 0.223 s
% 7.68/1.49 % Total time : 4.978 s
% 7.68/1.49 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 7.68/1.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------