%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV242-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.24s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 18 ~; 13 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 sgn 29 !; 0 ?; 17 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1447,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0) ).
fof(f1462,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,c_union(X0,X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__upper1_0) ).
fof(f1463,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,c_union(X1,X0,X2),tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__upper2_0) ).
fof(f1464,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(X3,X0,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0) ).
fof(f1465,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(v_G_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f1466,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f1467,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
tcf(c_1441,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(v_G_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1465]) ).
tcf(c_1442,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1466]) ).
tcf(c_1443,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1467]) ).
tcf(c_1444,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(X3,X0,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1464]) ).
tcf(c_1455,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1447]) ).
tcf(c_1460,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,c_union(X1,X0,X2),tc_set(X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1463]) ).
tcf(c_1461,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,c_union(X0,X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1462]) ).
tcf(c_5985,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1455,c_1444]) ).
tcf(c_6150,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_G_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1441,c_5985]) ).
tcf(c_6151,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_H_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1442,c_5985]) ).
tcf(c_6258,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_H_H,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6151,c_1443]) ).
tcf(c_6274,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6258,c_1460]) ).
tcf(c_6288,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_G_H,c_union(v_G_H,v_H_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6150,c_6274]) ).
tcf(c_6289,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6288,c_1461]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV242-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:50:11 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.42 % Proving...
% 3.24/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.24/1.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ iProver source info
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.24/1.19 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.24/1.19 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 26 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ Proving...
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ Problem Properties
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 %
% 3.24/1.19 % clauses 55
% 3.24/1.19 % conjectures 3
% 3.24/1.19 % EPR 9
% 3.24/1.19 % Horn 50
% 3.24/1.19 % unary 19
% 3.24/1.19 % binary 28
% 3.24/1.19 % lits 99
% 3.24/1.19 % lits eq 19
% 3.24/1.19 % fd_pure 0
% 3.24/1.19 % fd_pseudo 0
% 3.24/1.19 % fd_cond 4
% 3.24/1.19 % fd_pseudo_cond 7
% 3.24/1.19 % AC symbols 0
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % ------
% 3.24/1.19 % Current options:
% 3.24/1.19 % ------
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 %
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % ------ Proving...
% 3.24/1.19 %
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.24/1.19
% 3.24/1.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------