%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV243-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.66s 0.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 8 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)) != c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__synth__Un_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__synth__Un_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__empty__right_0,axiom,
c_union(X1,c_emptyset,X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__empty__right_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)) != c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_Message_Oanalz__synth__Un_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_union(X1,c_emptyset,X2) = X1,
cls_Set_OUn__empty__right_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)) != c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV243-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:36:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.66/0.76 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.66/0.76 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.66/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.66/0.76 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.66/0.76 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.76 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.76 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.76 % new_bool_3 with pid 2160344 completed with status 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.66/0.76 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.66/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.66/0.76 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.66/0.76 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.76 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.66/0.76 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.66/0.76 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.66/0.76 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.66/0.76 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.76 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2160347 completed with status 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.66/0.76 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.66/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.66/0.76 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.66/0.76 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.76 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.66/0.76 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.66/0.76 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.66/0.76 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.66/0.76 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.76 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 1.66/0.76
% 1.66/0.76 % Proof found!
% 1.66/0.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.66/0.76 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.66/0.76 % Parsed axioms : 2826
% 1.66/0.76 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2404
% 1.66/0.76 % Initial clauses : 422
% 1.66/0.76 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Initial clauses in saturation : 422
% 1.66/0.76 % Processed clauses : 3485
% 1.66/0.76 % ...of these trivial : 87
% 1.66/0.76 % ...subsumed : 2464
% 1.66/0.76 % ...remaining for further processing : 934
% 1.66/0.76 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 156
% 1.66/0.76 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Backward-subsumed : 31
% 1.66/0.76 % Backward-rewritten : 73
% 1.66/0.76 % Generated clauses : 14329
% 1.66/0.76 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10420
% 1.66/0.76 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Paramodulations : 14154
% 1.66/0.76 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % NegExts : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Equation resolutions : 175
% 1.66/0.76 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Total rewrite steps : 7007
% 1.66/0.76 % ...of those cached : 6016
% 1.66/0.76 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.66/0.76 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.66/0.76 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.66/0.76 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.66/0.76 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.66/0.76 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.66/0.76 % Current number of processed clauses : 830
% 1.66/0.76 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 243
% 1.66/0.76 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 1.66/0.76 % Negative unit clauses : 180
% 1.66/0.76 % Non-unit-clauses : 403
% 1.66/0.76 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7198
% 1.66/0.76 % ...number of literals in the above : 22925
% 1.66/0.76 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Current number of archived clauses : 104
% 1.66/0.76 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 32285
% 1.66/0.76 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11326
% 1.66/0.76 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 448
% 1.66/0.76 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5675
% 1.66/0.76 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % BW rewrite match attempts : 586
% 1.66/0.76 % BW rewrite match successes : 77
% 1.66/0.76 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.66/0.76 % Termbank termtop insertions : 212928
% 1.66/0.76 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7587
% 1.66/0.76
% 1.66/0.76 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.66/0.76 % User time : 0.249 s
% 1.66/0.76 % System time : 0.019 s
% 1.66/0.76 % Total time : 0.268 s
% 1.66/0.76 % Maximum resident set size: 6228 pages
% 1.66/0.76
% 1.66/0.76 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.66/0.76 % User time : 0.301 s
% 1.66/0.76 % System time : 0.026 s
% 1.66/0.76 % Total time : 0.328 s
% 1.66/0.76 % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 1.66/0.76 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------