%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV243-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.00s 2.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?; 10 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3181,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : c_union(X0,X0,X1) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__absorb_0) ).
fof(f3189,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : c_union(X0,c_emptyset,X1) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__empty__right_0) ).
fof(f3431,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(X0),X1,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__synth__Un_0) ).
fof(f3433,negated_conjecture,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)) != c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
tcf(c_4915,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_union(X0,X0,X1) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3181]) ).
tcf(c_4920,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_union(X0,c_emptyset,X1) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3189]) ).
tcf(c_5104,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_Message_Omsg) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(X0),X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3431]) ).
tcf(c_5106,negated_conjecture,
c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) != c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3433]) ).
tcf(c_5680,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(X0),X0,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4915,c_5104]) ).
tcf(c_5682,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_Message_Omsg) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(X0),c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4920,c_5104]) ).
tcf(c_5697,plain,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_H),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)) != c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5106,c_5680]) ).
tcf(c_8245,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_Message_Omsg) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(X0)),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5682,c_4920]) ).
tcf(c_8413,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(X0),X0,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(X0)),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5680,c_8245]) ).
tcf(c_8447,plain,
$false,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8413,c_5697]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV243-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:50:37 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.39 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.46 % Proving...
% 11.00/2.34 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 11.00/2.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 % ------ iProver source info
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 11.00/2.34 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 11.00/2.34 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 11.00/2.34 % ------ Proving...
% 11.00/2.34 % ------ Problem Properties
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 %
% 11.00/2.34 % clauses 2232
% 11.00/2.34 % conjectures 1
% 11.00/2.34 % EPR 668
% 11.00/2.34 % Horn 2036
% 11.00/2.34 % unary 664
% 11.00/2.34 % binary 1115
% 11.00/2.34 % lits 4481
% 11.00/2.34 % lits eq 1236
% 11.00/2.34 % fd_pure 0
% 11.00/2.34 % fd_pseudo 0
% 11.00/2.34 % fd_cond 118
% 11.00/2.34 % fd_pseudo_cond 77
% 11.00/2.34 % AC symbols 0
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 % ------
% 11.00/2.34 % Current options:
% 11.00/2.34 % ------
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 %
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 % ------ Proving...
% 11.00/2.34 %
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 11.00/2.34
% 11.00/2.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------