%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV244-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.11s 1.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 15 ~; 12 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn 28 !; 0 ?; 14 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1393,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).
fof(f1394,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).
fof(f1395,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,X1,X3)
| c_in(X0,X2,X3)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
fof(f1452,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
fof(f1476,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f1477,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
tcf(c_1451,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1476]) ).
tcf(c_1452,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1477]) ).
tcf(c_1457,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X0,X2,X3)
| c_in(X0,X1,X3)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1395]) ).
tcf(c_1458,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1394]) ).
tcf(c_1459,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1393]) ).
tcf(c_1467,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1452]) ).
tcf(c_5549,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1458,c_1452]) ).
tcf(c_5555,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1459,c_1452]) ).
tcf(c_5567,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1467,c_5549]) ).
tcf(c_5568,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1459,c_5567]) ).
tcf(c_5937,plain,
( c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1457]) ).
tcf(c_5938,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_5937,c_5568,c_5555,c_1451]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV244-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.44 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.44 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:51:48 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.44 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.49
% 0.13/0.49 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.49
% 0.13/0.50 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.52 % Proving...
% 4.11/1.38 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.11/1.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ iProver source info
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.11/1.38 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.11/1.38 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 26 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ Proving...
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ Problem Properties
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 %
% 4.11/1.38 % clauses 57
% 4.11/1.38 % conjectures 2
% 4.11/1.38 % EPR 9
% 4.11/1.38 % Horn 50
% 4.11/1.38 % unary 17
% 4.11/1.38 % binary 29
% 4.11/1.38 % lits 108
% 4.11/1.38 % lits eq 19
% 4.11/1.38 % fd_pure 0
% 4.11/1.38 % fd_pseudo 0
% 4.11/1.38 % fd_cond 4
% 4.11/1.38 % fd_pseudo_cond 7
% 4.11/1.38 % AC symbols 0
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % ------
% 4.11/1.38 % Current options:
% 4.11/1.38 % ------
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 %
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % ------ Proving...
% 4.11/1.38 %
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.11/1.38
% 4.11/1.38
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------