%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 06:36:49 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.40s % Output : Refutation 0.40s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP9636/SWV/SWV244-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ...... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 383] [nf = 0] [nu = 368] [ut = 257] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_union_3(c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) % B1: ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_union_3(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) % B2: ~c_in_3(x0,x1,x2) | c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x1,x3,x2),x2) % B3: ~c_in_3(x0,x1,x2) | c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x3,x1,x2),x2) % B4: ~c_in_3(x0,x1,tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(x0,c_Message_Oanalz_1(x1),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) % B5: ~c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x1,x2,x3),x3) | c_in_3(x0,x2,x3) | c_in_3(x0,x1,x3) % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U5: < d1 v0 dv0 f2 c5 t7 td3 > ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) % U6: < d1 v0 dv0 f1 c3 t4 td2 > ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) % U256: < d1 v0 dv0 f1 c5 t6 td2 > ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) % U257: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c3 t3 td1 > c_in_3(v_X_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) % U261: < d2 v0 dv0 f6 c11 t17 td5 > ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_union_3(c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),c_union_3(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) % U568: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c3 t3 td1 > ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U5: % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_union_3(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... B1 % ~c_in_3(x0,x1,x2) | c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x1,x3,x2),x2) ....... B2 % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(), c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(), v_H_0(), tc_Message_Omsg_0())), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R1 [B1:L0, B2:L1] % Derivation of unit clause U6: % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_union_3(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... B1 % ~c_in_3(x0,x1,x2) | c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x3,x1,x2),x2) ....... B3 % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(), c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R1 [B1:L0, B3:L1] % Derivation of unit clause U256: % ~c_in_3(x0,x1,tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(x0,c_Message_Oanalz_1(x1),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... B4 % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U5 % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(), c_union_3(v_G_0(), v_H_0(), tc_Message_Omsg_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R1 [B4:L1, U5:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U257: % c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_union_3(c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... B0 % ~c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x1,x2,x3),x3) | c_in_3(x0,x2,x3) | c_in_3(x0,x1,x3) ....... B5 % c_in_3(v_X_0(), v_H_0(), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(v_X_0(), c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B5:L0] % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U6 % c_in_3(v_X_0(), v_H_0(), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L1, U6:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U261: % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_union_3(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... B1 % ~c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x1,x2,x3),x3) | c_in_3(x0,x2,x3) | c_in_3(x0,x1,x3) ....... B5 % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(), c_union_3(x0, c_union_3(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(), v_H_0(), tc_Message_Omsg_0())), c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(v_X_0(), x0, tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R1 [B1:L0, B5:L1] % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U256 % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(), c_union_3(c_union_3(v_G_0(), v_H_0(), tc_Message_Omsg_0()), c_union_3(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(), v_H_0(), tc_Message_Omsg_0())), c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L1, U256:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U568: % ~c_in_3(x0,x1,x2) | c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x1,x3,x2),x2) ....... B2 % ~c_in_3(x0,x1,x2) | c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x3,x1,x2),x2) ....... B3 % c_in_3(x0, c_union_3(c_union_3(x1, x2, x3), x4, x3), x3) | ~c_in_3(x0, x2, x3) ....... R1 [B2:L0, B3:L1] % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_union_3(c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),c_union_3(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_union_3(v_G_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),c_Message_Osynth_1(v_G_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U261 % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(), v_H_0(), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U261:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % ~c_in_3(v_X_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U568 % c_in_3(v_X_0(),v_H_0(),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U257 % [] ....... R1 [U568:L0, U257:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 2298 % resolvents: 2298 factors: 0 % Number of unit clauses generated: 2242 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 97.56 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 2 [1] = 255 [2] = 312 % Total = 569 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 2242 [2] = 56 % Average size of a generated clause: 2.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] c_in_3 (+)511 (-)58 % ------------------ % Total: (+)511 (-)58 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 569 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 9 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 2307 % Number of unification failures: 129 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 29380 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 408 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 8 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 1362 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 937 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 55 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 10 % Number of states in UCFA table: 7334 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 12950 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.01 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.57 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 2436 % ConstructUnitClause() = 1929 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.01 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: inf % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 1 secs % CPU time: 0.38 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------