%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 10 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 0 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnE_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV244-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:35:50 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.57 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.57 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.57 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57 % sh5l with pid 2729911 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.57 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.26/0.57 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.57 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.26/0.57 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.57 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.57 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2729915 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.57 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.26/0.58 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.58 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.58 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.58
% 0.26/0.58 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.58 % Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.26/0.58 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.26/0.58 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.26/0.58 % Processed clauses : 11
% 0.26/0.58 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.26/0.58 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Generated clauses : 8
% 0.26/0.58 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.26/0.58 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Paramodulations : 8
% 0.26/0.58 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58 % Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.26/0.58 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.58 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.26/0.58 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.26/0.58 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.58 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.26/0.58 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.26/0.58 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.26/0.58 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.58 % Termbank termtop insertions : 222
% 0.26/0.58 % Search garbage collected termcells : 12
% 0.26/0.58
% 0.26/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.58 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.26/0.58 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.58 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.26/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.26/0.58
% 0.26/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.58 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.58 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.26/0.58 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.26/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------