%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV245-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.18s 1.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 39 ( 18 ~; 21 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 0 sgn 48 !; 0 ?; 28 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1393,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).
fof(f1394,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).
fof(f1395,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,X1,X3)
| c_in(X0,X2,X3)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
fof(f1435,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_1) ).
fof(f1439,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__synth_1) ).
fof(f1452,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
fof(f1477,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f1478,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
tcf(c_1453,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1477]) ).
tcf(c_1454,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1478]) ).
tcf(c_1459,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X0,X2,X3)
| c_in(X0,X1,X3)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1395]) ).
tcf(c_1460,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1394]) ).
tcf(c_1461,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1393]) ).
tcf(c_1470,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1439]) ).
tcf(c_1472,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1435]) ).
tcf(c_1476,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1452]) ).
tcf(c_5402,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1460,c_1454]) ).
tcf(c_5409,plain,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1461,c_1454]) ).
tcf(c_5454,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1476,c_1472]) ).
tcf(c_5467,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1460,c_5454]) ).
tcf(c_5952,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1453,c_1459]) ).
tcf(c_6193,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5952,c_1472]) ).
tcf(c_6201,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6193,c_5402]) ).
tcf(c_6351,plain,
( c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6201,c_1470]) ).
tcf(c_6352,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6351,c_5409]) ).
tcf(c_6374,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,X0,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6352,c_5467]) ).
tcf(c_6382,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5402,c_6374]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV245-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:51:45 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.41 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.42 % Proving...
% 4.18/1.27 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.18/1.27 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ iProver source info
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.18/1.27 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.18/1.27 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 26 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ Proving...
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ Problem Properties
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 %
% 4.18/1.27 % clauses 52
% 4.18/1.27 % conjectures 3
% 4.18/1.27 % EPR 9
% 4.18/1.27 % Horn 46
% 4.18/1.27 % unary 17
% 4.18/1.27 % binary 25
% 4.18/1.27 % lits 97
% 4.18/1.27 % lits eq 19
% 4.18/1.27 % fd_pure 0
% 4.18/1.27 % fd_pseudo 0
% 4.18/1.27 % fd_cond 4
% 4.18/1.27 % fd_pseudo_cond 7
% 4.18/1.27 % AC symbols 0
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % ------
% 4.18/1.27 % Current options:
% 4.18/1.27 % ------
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 %
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % ------ Proving...
% 4.18/1.27 %
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.18/1.27
% 4.18/1.27
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------