↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV246-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.33s 1.11s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   63 (  17 unt;  10 nHn;  46 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  124 (   8 equ;  56 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  145 (  16 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__analzD__dest_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__analzD__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | X2 = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | c_in(X1,X2,X4)
    | c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_Y,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__synth_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__synth_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUn__least_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X4,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_lessequals(c_union(X4,X1,X3),X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__least_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__analzD__dest_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | X2 = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
    cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | X2 = X1 ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)),X2,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)),X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | c_in(X1,X2,X4)
    | c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnE_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_Message_Oanalz(X1) = c_Message_Oanalz(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_Y,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | c_in(X1,X2,X4)
    | c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oanalz(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_Y,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    c_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__synth_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oanalz(X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
    c_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X4,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_lessequals(c_union(X4,X1,X3),X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUn__least_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X4,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_lessequals(c_union(X4,X1,X3),X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    c_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4),X2,X4)
    | c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X4,X1),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(X4))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X4))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4))
    | X1 = c_union(X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X1,X2,X3),tc_set(X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
    cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X3))
    | c_union(X1,X2,X3) = X1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_58])]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_G,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_61]),c_0_57])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV246-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.56  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.56  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.56  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.56  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.56  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.56  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.56  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.56  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:37:16 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.56  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.56  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.61  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.61  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.33/1.11  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.33/1.11  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.33/1.11  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3875421 completed with status 0
% 3.33/1.11  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 3.33/1.11  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.33/1.11  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.33/1.11  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.33/1.11  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 3.33/1.11  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3875434 completed with status 0
% 3.33/1.11  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 3.33/1.11  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.33/1.11  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.33/1.11  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.33/1.11  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 3.33/1.11  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.33/1.11  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.33/1.11  % Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 3.33/1.11  
% 3.33/1.11  % Proof found!
% 3.33/1.11  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.33/1.11  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.33/1.11  % Parsed axioms                        : 1403
% 3.33/1.11  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.33/1.11  % Initial clauses                      : 1403
% 3.33/1.11  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 3.33/1.11  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1402
% 3.33/1.11  % Processed clauses                    : 7505
% 3.33/1.11  % ...of these trivial                  : 1472
% 3.33/1.11  % ...subsumed                          : 3483
% 3.33/1.11  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2550
% 3.33/1.11  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 45
% 3.33/1.11  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.33/1.11  % Backward-subsumed                    : 17
% 3.33/1.11  % Backward-rewritten                   : 289
% 3.33/1.11  % Generated clauses                    : 39043
% 3.33/1.11  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31274
% 3.33/1.11  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.33/1.11  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 3.33/1.11  % Paramodulations                      : 38950
% 3.33/1.11  % Factorizations                       : 6
% 3.33/1.11  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.33/1.11  % Equation resolutions                 : 87
% 3.33/1.11  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.33/1.11  % Total rewrite steps                  : 29233
% 3.33/1.11  % ...of those cached                   : 27725
% 3.33/1.11  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.33/1.11  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.33/1.11  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.33/1.11  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.33/1.11  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.33/1.11  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.33/1.11  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.33/1.11  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.33/1.11  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.33/1.11  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.33/1.11  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.33/1.11  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.33/1.11  % Current number of processed clauses  : 2244
% 3.33/1.11  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 591
% 3.33/1.11  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.33/1.11  %    Negative unit clauses             : 46
% 3.33/1.11  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1607
% 3.33/1.11  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24327
% 3.33/1.11  % ...number of literals in the above   : 50298
% 3.33/1.11  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.33/1.11  % Current number of archived clauses   : 306
% 3.33/1.11  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1919501
% 3.33/1.11  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1835856
% 3.33/1.11  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3272
% 3.33/1.11  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17318
% 3.33/1.11  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.33/1.11  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2926
% 3.33/1.11  % BW rewrite match successes           : 194
% 3.33/1.11  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.33/1.11  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.33/1.11  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 631756
% 3.33/1.11  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1693
% 3.33/1.11  
% 3.33/1.11  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.33/1.11  % User time                : 0.427 s
% 3.33/1.11  % System time              : 0.027 s
% 3.33/1.11  % Total time               : 0.454 s
% 3.33/1.11  % Maximum resident set size: 5920 pages
% 3.33/1.11  
% 3.33/1.11  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.33/1.11  % User time                : 2.077 s
% 3.33/1.11  % System time              : 0.087 s
% 3.33/1.11  % Total time               : 2.163 s
% 3.33/1.11  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 3.33/1.11  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------