↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SWV246-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:58:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.11s 3.07s
% Output   : Refutation 5.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  202 (  14   ~;  16   |;   0   &; 172   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (  10 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0   ^;  40   !;   0   ?;  40   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_in_decl,type,
    c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_decl,type,
    c_Message_Omsg_OMPair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(v_X_decl,type,
    v_X: $i ).

thf(v_Y_decl,type,
    v_Y: $i ).

thf(c_union_decl,type,
    c_union: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(c_Message_Oanalz_decl,type,
    c_Message_Oanalz: $i > $i ).

thf(v_G_decl,type,
    v_G: $i ).

thf(v_H_decl,type,
    v_H: $i ).

thf(tc_Message_Omsg_decl,type,
    tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).

thf(c_Message_Osynth_decl,type,
    c_Message_Osynth: $i > $i ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_G @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ ( v_G @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_union ) ) @ ( v_Y @ c_in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_G @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ ( v_G @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_union ) ) @ ( v_Y @ c_in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ c_in ) ) )
      | ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( B @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__synth_0) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ c_in ) ) )
      | ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( B @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( C @ ( D @ ( B @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( C @ ( D @ ( B @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_G @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ ( v_G @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_union ) ) @ ( v_Y @ ( v_X @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ c_in ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

thf(9,plain,
    tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_G @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ ( v_G @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_union ) ) @ ( v_Y @ ( v_X @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ c_in ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oanalz @ ( B @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oanalz @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oanalz @ ( B @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oanalz @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( C @ ( B @ ( D @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( C @ ( B @ ( D @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ c_Message_Oanalz @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ c_Message_Oanalz @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,14,20,9,22,12,18,16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWV246-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.22/0.48  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.48  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.48  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.48  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.48  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.48  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.48  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.22/0.48  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:23:18 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.48  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.27/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.55/1.39  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (217ms). 
% 1.76/1.41  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.54/2.03  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.54/2.04  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.01/2.17  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 6 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.09/2.22  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 6 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.09/2.25  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 3.09/2.25  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.09/2.26  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.11/3.06  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.11/3.06  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.11/3.07  % Time passed: 2376ms (effective reasoning time: 1646ms)
% 5.11/3.07  % Axioms used in derivation (6): cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0, cls_Set_OUnCI_1, cls_Set_OUnE_0, cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0, cls_Set_OUnCI_0, cls_Message_OMPair__synth_0
% 5.11/3.07  % No. of inferences in proof: 17
% 5.11/3.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2376 ms resp. 1646 ms w/o parsing
% 5.11/3.13  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.11/3.13  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------