↑ Up

SPASS-SCL---0.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS-SCL---0.1
% Problem  : SWV246-2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  7 07:36:57 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.62s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWV246-2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May  7 13:29:12 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  SPASS-SCL-FOL version:
% 0.20/0.43  SPASS-SCL-FOL 0.1 (595c0c7b1) [parallel mode]
% 0.60/0.62  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_normal -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.62  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_1 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.62  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_2 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.62  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_3 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.62  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_lmodel_grow -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.62  Execution resolution_1 ended with status: unsatisfiable
% 0.60/0.62  Used heuristic: resolution_1
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62   Input Clauses:
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62   Predicates: c_in 
% 0.60/0.62   Fol Constants: v_X v_Y v_G v_H tc_Message_Omsg 
% 0.60/0.62   Fol Functions: c_Message_Omsg_OMPair c_union c_Message_Oanalz c_Message_Osynth 
% 0.60/0.62   Problem Properties:
% 0.60/0.62   This is a full first-order problem without equality.
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62   After reduction:  Problem Properties:
% 0.60/0.62   This is a full first-order problem without equality.
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62   Reduced Input Clauses:
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62   Most General Atoms: c_in(x0,x1,x3) 
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62  === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 11 atoms initially, heuristics mode: resolution_1 ===
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62  === Backtracking. Learning clause 9:2:3:[5.2,3.1]:TopTopTop: c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(x0,x1),x2,tc_Message_Omsg) -> c_in(x1,c_Message_Oanalz(x2),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.60/0.62  === Backtracking. Learning clause 10:1:0:[7.2,2.1]:: c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) -> 
% 0.60/0.62  === Backtracking. Learning clause 11:1:0:[6.2,2.1]:: c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg) -> 
% 0.60/0.62  === Backtracking. Learning clause 12:1:0:[8.1,1.1,3.1,10.1]::  -> c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.60/0.62  === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 18
% 0.60/0.62  === Restarting.
% 0.60/0.62  === Backtracking. Learning clause 14:1:0:[11.0,13.0,4.1,12.1]::  -> c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_G,tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.60/0.62  === Conflict found: 9:2:3:[5.2,3.1]:TopTopTop: c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(x0,x1),x2,tc_Message_Omsg) -> c_in(x1,c_Message_Oanalz(x2),tc_Message_Omsg) {x0 -> v_X, x1 -> v_Y, x2 -> c_Message_Osynth(v_G)}
% 0.60/0.62  === Backtracking. Learning clause 15:1:0:[9.1,12.1]::  -> c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Osynth(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.60/0.62  === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 19
% 0.60/0.62  === Restarting.
% 0.60/0.62  === Conflict found: 9:2:3:[5.2,3.1]:TopTopTop: c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(x0,x1),x2,tc_Message_Omsg) -> c_in(x1,c_Message_Oanalz(x2),tc_Message_Omsg) {x0 -> v_X, x1 -> v_Y, x2 -> v_G}
% 0.60/0.62  === Backtracking. Learning clause 16:1:0:[9.1,14.1]::  -> c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.60/0.62  === Conflict found: 9:2:3:[5.2,3.1]:TopTopTop: c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(x0,x1),x2,tc_Message_Omsg) -> c_in(x1,c_Message_Oanalz(x2),tc_Message_Omsg) {x0 -> v_X, x1 -> v_Y, x2 -> c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)}
% 0.60/0.62  === Backtracking. Learning clause 17:1:0:[9.1,1.1]::  -> c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.60/0.62  === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 83
% 0.60/0.62  === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 147
% 0.60/0.62  === Conflict found: 9:2:3:[5.2,3.1]:TopTopTop: c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(x0,x1),x2,tc_Message_Omsg) -> c_in(x1,c_Message_Oanalz(x2),tc_Message_Omsg) {x0 -> v_X, x1 -> v_Y, x2 -> c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)}
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62  SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62  SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 0.60/0.62  Number of learned clauses: 8
% 0.60/0.62  Number of propagations: 145
% 0.60/0.62  Number of decisions: 74
% 0.60/0.62  Number of resolutions: 13
% 0.60/0.62  Number of condensations: 0
% 0.60/0.62  Number of sub resolutions: 1
% 0.60/0.62  Number of input literals (deduplicated): 10
% 0.60/0.62  Number of grows: 4
% 0.60/0.62  Number of considered ground atoms: 147
% 0.60/0.62  
% 0.60/0.62   Needed:       0:00:00.09
% 0.60/0.62  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------