↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV248-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:47 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 10.49s 2.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  16 unt;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  203 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   84 (  38   ~;  46   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   8 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   0 sgn  67   !;   0   ?;  43   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f127,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

fof(f128,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

fof(f1393,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).

fof(f1394,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).

fof(f1452,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).

fof(f1470,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV004-0.ax',cls_Message_Osynth_OInj_0) ).

fof(f1473,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0) ).

fof(f1475,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_union(X3,X0,X2),X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__least_0) ).

fof(f1476,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

tcf(c_1556,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).

tcf(c_1557,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f128]) ).

tcf(c_2009,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1393]) ).

tcf(c_2010,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1394]) ).

tcf(c_2060,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1452]) ).

tcf(c_2078,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1470]) ).

tcf(c_2081,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1473]) ).

tcf(c_2083,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_union(X3,X0,X2),X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1475]) ).

tcf(c_2084,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1476]) ).

tcf(c_14435,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14436,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14437,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_Message_Osynth(v_G),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14438,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_union(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14439,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = c_union(iPr_def_12,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14440,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14441,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_14442,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2084,c_14441,c_14439,c_14440,c_14437,c_14435,c_14436,c_14438]) ).

tcf(c_20560,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14440,c_2060]) ).

tcf(c_20576,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14437,c_2078]) ).

tcf(c_20897,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(v_G,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_G,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1556,c_20576]) ).

tcf(c_20899,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(v_G,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_G,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_20897,c_14441]) ).

tcf(c_21054,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14439,c_2009]) ).

tcf(c_21071,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14439,c_2010]) ).

tcf(c_21125,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1556,c_21054]) ).

tcf(c_21126,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(v_H,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_21125,c_14441]) ).

tcf(c_21156,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1556,c_21071]) ).

tcf(c_21159,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(v_G,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_G,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_20899,c_21071]) ).

tcf(c_21162,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_21156,c_14441]) ).

tcf(c_21354,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(v_H,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16)
    | c_lessequals(v_H,iPr_def_14,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21126,c_1557]) ).

tcf(c_21357,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_H,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_21354,c_14441]) ).

tcf(c_21563,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(v_G,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16)
    | c_lessequals(v_G,iPr_def_14,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21159,c_1557]) ).

tcf(c_21565,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_G,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_21563,c_14441]) ).

tcf(c_21575,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21162,c_20560]) ).

tcf(c_21716,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2081,c_14441]) ).

tcf(c_21723,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,X0,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14436,c_21716]) ).

tcf(c_21761,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16)
    | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14440,c_21723]) ).

tcf(c_21968,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16)
    | c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21575,c_1557]) ).

tcf(c_21969,plain,
    c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_21968,c_14441]) ).

tcf(c_25987,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_G,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14435,c_2083]) ).

tcf(c_25989,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14438,c_2083]) ).

tcf(c_26002,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,X0,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_25989,c_14441]) ).

tcf(c_26006,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_H,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_G,X0,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_25987,c_14441]) ).

tcf(c_27441,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16)
    | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21969,c_26002]) ).

tcf(c_27442,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27441,c_14442]) ).

tcf(c_27448,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_21761,c_27442]) ).

tcf(c_27958,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_H,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_21565,c_26006]) ).

tcf(c_27962,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27958,c_27448,c_21357]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV248-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:51:43 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.44  % Proving...
% 10.49/2.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 10.49/2.17  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % ------  iProver source info
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 10.49/2.17  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 10.49/2.17  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 18 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 30 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ Proving...
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % 
% 10.49/2.17  % clauses                               343
% 10.49/2.17  % conjectures                           1
% 10.49/2.17  % EPR                                   28
% 10.49/2.17  % Horn                                  310
% 10.49/2.17  % unary                                 89
% 10.49/2.17  % binary                                197
% 10.49/2.17  % lits                                  654
% 10.49/2.17  % lits eq                               192
% 10.49/2.17  % fd_pure                               0
% 10.49/2.17  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 10.49/2.17  % fd_cond                               21
% 10.49/2.17  % fd_pseudo_cond                        50
% 10.49/2.17  % AC symbols                            0
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ 
% 10.49/2.17  % Current options:
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ 
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % 
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % ------ Proving...
% 10.49/2.17  % 
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 10.49/2.17  
% 10.49/2.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------