↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV248-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:47 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.31s 1.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  19 unt;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  199 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   86 (  41   ~;  45   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   8 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (   0 sgn  74   !;   0   ?;  50   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Osynth_OInj_0) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_union(X3,X0,X2),X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__least_0) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(v_G),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(v_G),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_union(X3,X0,X2),X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_110,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_111,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_112,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_Message_Osynth(v_G),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_113,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_union(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_114,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = c_union(iPr_def_12,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_115,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_116,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_117,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_116,c_114,c_115,c_112,c_110,c_111,c_113]) ).

tcf(c_331,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oanalz(X1),iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_334,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,X0,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_331]) ).

tcf(c_366,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_376,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_392,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_443,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16)
    | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_334]) ).

tcf(c_473,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_392]) ).

tcf(c_476,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(v_G,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_G,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_366]) ).

tcf(c_477,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_376]) ).

tcf(c_482,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(v_H,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_477,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_485,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(v_G,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_G,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_476,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_494,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_14,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_473,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_524,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_527,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),tc_set(X3))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3),X1,X3) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_532,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_524,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_557,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_H,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_G,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_558,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,X0,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_565,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,X0,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_558,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_569,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_H,X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ c_lessequals(v_G,X0,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_557,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_618,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(v_H,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16)
    | c_lessequals(v_H,iPr_def_14,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_482,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_620,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_H,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_618,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_912,plain,
    c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_14),iPr_def_16),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_494,c_532]) ).

tcf(c_924,plain,
    c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_912,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_996,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16)
    | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_924,c_565]) ).

tcf(c_997,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_996,c_117]) ).

tcf(c_998,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_443,c_997]) ).

tcf(c_1021,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_G,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_620,c_569]) ).

tcf(c_1027,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_G,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1021,c_998]) ).

tcf(c_3221,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(v_G,c_union(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_16)
      | c_lessequals(v_G,c_union(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_485,c_527]) ).

tcf(c_3233,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(v_G,c_union(iPr_def_12,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),iPr_def_16),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3221,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_3395,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_G,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_3233]) ).

tcf(c_3396,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3395,c_1027]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV248-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:55:10 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.38  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.38  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.40  % Proving...
% 2.31/1.16  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.31/1.16  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.31/1.16  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.31/1.16  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ Proving...
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % 
% 2.31/1.16  % clauses                               16
% 2.31/1.16  % conjectures                           1
% 2.31/1.16  % EPR                                   1
% 2.31/1.16  % Horn                                  15
% 2.31/1.16  % unary                                 8
% 2.31/1.16  % binary                                7
% 2.31/1.16  % lits                                  25
% 2.31/1.16  % lits eq                               7
% 2.31/1.16  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.31/1.16  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.31/1.16  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.31/1.16  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.31/1.16  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ 
% 2.31/1.16  % Current options:
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ 
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % 
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % ------ Proving...
% 2.31/1.16  % 
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.31/1.16  
% 2.31/1.16  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------