%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV250-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:05 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 12 unt; 4 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 4 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_2,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_2) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__synth__Un_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__synth__Un_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__analz__Un_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__analz__Un_0) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUn__iff_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUn__iff_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUn__iff_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_Message_Oanalz__synth__Un_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),
cls_Message_Oanalz__analz__Un_0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV250-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:36:13 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1335042 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.43 % Search class: FGUSS-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % partial match(1): FGUSF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 1335050 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.43 % Search class: FGUSS-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % partial match(1): FGUSF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.11/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.11/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.11/0.43 % Processed clauses : 22
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.11/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.11/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Generated clauses : 25
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19
% 0.11/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Paramodulations : 25
% 0.11/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.11/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.11/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.11/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 14
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.11/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23
% 0.11/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.11/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.11/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.11/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 763
% 0.11/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 9
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.43 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.11/0.43 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------