↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SWV250-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:58:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.44s 6.93s
% Output   : Refutation 3.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  162 (   8   ~;   8   |;   0   &; 146   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0   ^;  32   !;   0   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_in_decl,type,
    c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(v_x_decl,type,
    v_x: $i ).

thf(c_Message_Oanalz_decl,type,
    c_Message_Oanalz: $i > $i ).

thf(c_union_decl,type,
    c_union: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(c_Message_Osynth_decl,type,
    c_Message_Osynth: $i > $i ).

thf(v_G_decl,type,
    v_G: $i ).

thf(v_H_decl,type,
    v_H: $i ).

thf(tc_Message_Omsg_decl,type,
    tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ ( v_G @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz @ ( v_G @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_Message_Osynth @ c_union ) ) @ ( v_x @ c_in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ ( v_G @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz @ ( v_G @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_Message_Osynth @ c_union ) ) @ ( v_x @ c_in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Osynth @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz )
      = ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( A @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_union ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__synth__Un_0) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Osynth @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz )
      = ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( A @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_union ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( C @ ( D @ ( B @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_1) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( C @ ( D @ ( B @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz )
      = ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__analz__Un_0) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz )
      = ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ ( v_G @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_Message_Osynth @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz @ ( v_x @ c_in ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

thf(8,plain,
    tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ ( v_G @ c_Message_Oanalz @ c_Message_Osynth @ c_union ) ) @ c_Message_Oanalz @ ( v_x @ c_in ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( C @ ( B @ ( D @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_2) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( C @ ( B @ ( D @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_0) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[9,13,17,11,8,19,15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWV250-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.22/5.49  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.22/5.49  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/5.49  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/5.49  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/5.49  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/5.49  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/5.49  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.22/5.49  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:23:20 UTC 2026
% 0.22/5.49  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/5.49  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.26/5.96  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.27/6.11  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (142ms). 
% 1.27/6.12  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.74/6.44  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.74/6.45  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.15/6.50  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 5 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.15/6.52  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 5 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.15/6.53  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.15/6.54  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.15/6.54  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.44/6.93  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.44/6.93  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.44/6.93  % Time passed: 1306ms (effective reasoning time: 803ms)
% 3.44/6.93  % Axioms used in derivation (5): cls_Message_Oanalz__synth__Un_0, cls_Set_OUn__iff_0, cls_Set_OUn__iff_1, cls_Message_Oanalz__analz__Un_0, cls_Set_OUn__iff_2
% 3.44/6.93  % No. of inferences in proof: 15
% 3.44/6.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1306 ms resp. 803 ms w/o parsing
% 3.44/6.99  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.44/6.99  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------